Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Piemonte Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$307kHuman Services$125kEducation$20kReligion$15kRecreation & Sports$6kEnvironment$5kPhilanthropy$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USC$50,000
USC - Orthodontic Department of the Ostrow School of Dentistry$12,000
USC - Oral Cancer Research$12,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
USC Caruso Catholic Center$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,560
Hoag Hospital Foundation$1,400
Curebound$1,300
Loyola High School$1,250
Vivante$1,000
The Nature Conservacy$1,000
American Cancer Society$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Loyola Marymount University$650
Little Red Dog$585
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $125 → 9%Ainsley's Angels of America: $104 → 10%Hillsides: $200 → 14%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $600 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $500 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $500 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $300 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $200 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $100 → 11%St Joseph Center: $100 → 14%Assistance League of Santa Ana: $10k → 10%Assistance League of Santa Ana: $5k → 10%Freedom Dogs: $350 → 11%Assistance League of Santa Ana: $5k → 10%Freedom Dogs: $125 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
SC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$594k · 53 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
46

Total granted

$594k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+18%

Still filing today

38%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    Assistance League of Long Beach
    7× · 2018–2024 · $104k · revenue +11%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +300%
  • AL
    Assistance League of Santa Ana
    3× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • ME
    Marengo Elementary School
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TL
    The Loyola Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
7
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State University Long Beach Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Altadena Mountain Rescue Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
28/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USC - Orthodontic Department of the Ostrow School of Dentistry: $279,250 · OtherUSC - Orthodontic Department of the Ostrow School of DentistryAssistance League of Long Beach: $104,000 · OtherAssistance League of Long BeachUSC: $62,205 · OtherUSC+84 more: $112,649 · Other+84 moreHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $21,200 · HealthCUREBOUND: $7,944 · HealthSONG FOR CHARLIE INC: $2,500 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC: $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,437 · Health+6 more: $3,100 · HealthAssistance League of Santa Ana: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $2,200 · Human Services+5 more: $1,004 · Human ServicesPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $1,600 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $1,300 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $650 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $250 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,200 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $1,100 · Youth DevelopmentEmpowered Girls Inc: $250 · Youth DevelopmentLittle Red Dog Inc: $1,835 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $150 · Animals+1 more: $50 · AnimalsHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $750 · PhilanthropyTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $710 · Philanthropy
Other$558,104Health$38,681Human Services$23,204Education$4,050Youth Development$2,550Animals$2,035Philanthropy$1,460

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAssistance League of Long Beach: $104,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $21,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAssistance League of Santa Ana: $20,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCUREBOUND: $7,944 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSONG FOR CHARLIE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $2,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Red Dog Inc: $1,835 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $1,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,437 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $1,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS: $1,099 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $710 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALD CONNECT INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM DOGS: $475 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLIAM WARDRIP FOUNDATION: $325 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowered Girls Inc: $250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAE HOUSE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Center: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON ATHLETIC FUND ATHLETIC FUND: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA SCORES LA: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA Triathlon of Colorado: $16 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Santa Ana ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds SONG FOR CHARLIE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Red Dog Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BLINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson FoundationCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Confidence Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Piemonte Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Piemonte Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Piemonte’s filings →

More from the funding graph