Skip to content
The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$659k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$23MHealth$2.6MEducation$1.1MPublic Benefit$490kCrime & Legal$434kRecreation & Sports$253kInternational$95kAnimals$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
ANYTIME ALLSTARS$75,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND$25,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$20,000
JUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,790
VITA NOVA$10,000
OPERATION SANDCASTLE$7,500
SPAULDING REHABIITATION FOR BOSTON MARATHON$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND: $25k → 13%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND: $25k → 13%VITA NOVA: $10k → 11%ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 13 repeat orgs$702k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$27M
$686k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+27%

Still filing today

77%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +24% · 33% of their budget
  • TC
    The Curetivity Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $950k · revenue +86%
  • WC
    WARRIORS CHOICE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $490k · revenue +36% · 90% of their budget

Funded once

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +27%
  • UO
    University of Miamigraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +29%
  • US
    UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Inc

The mission of jupiter medical center is to deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve, regardless of their ability to pay. certain services are provided at a loss or at no payment…

Health
2
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
3
Dogs for Life Inc

The corporation's mission is to improve the quality of life for people and dogs through training assistance dogs, pet therapy dogs, and owning and operating an off-leash dog park. the corporation also assists with enhancing the quality of…

Animals
4
Boca School for Autism Inc

A school for 5-22 year old students with developmental and learning challenges that provides a safe and dignified learning environment to explore and realize their true abilities and potential.

Education
5
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
6
Renaissance Learning Academy Inc
Education
7
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
8
Cure Rare Disease Inc

Our mission is to enable and finance the development of life-saving genetic medicines for ultra-rare patient populations previously deemed too rare to treat. to realize this, our unique ecosystems facilitates collaboration between…

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
11
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
12
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAVE OUR MUSICIANS FOUNDATION INC: $22,570,000 · Arts & CultureSAVE OUR MUSICIANS FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,714,574 · HealthWARRIOR HEALT…The Curetivity Foundation: $950,000 · HealthThe Curetivit…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $323,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER …ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthELUNA FORMERL…+2 more: $57,500 · HealthWARRIORS CHOICE FOUNDATION INC: $490,369 · Public BenefitANYTIME ALLSTARS INC: $252,947 · OtherUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherCAMO FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · OtherJUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $30,790 · OtherKIDS GIVE TO KIDS: $95,000 · OtherPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $50,000 · OtherBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $25,000 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $50,000 · Other+8 more: $71,551 · OtherOPERATION SANDCASTLE INC: $433,770 · Crime & LegalJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $250,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Miami: $100,000 · EducationThe Pine School Inc: $50,000 · EducationTHE RENAISSANCE LEARNING CENTER INC: $15,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$22,580,000Health$3,245,074Public Benefit$490,369Other$722,788Crime & Legal$433,770Philanthropy$250,000Education$165,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVE OUR MUSICIANS FOUNDATION INC: $22,570,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,714,574 over 5y, 33% of budgetThe Curetivity Foundation: $950,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetWARRIORS CHOICE FOUNDATION INC: $490,369 over 4y, 90% of budgetOPERATION SANDCASTLE INC: $433,770 over 2y, 100% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $323,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Pine School Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSROADS CLUB INC: $37,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetJUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $30,790 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RENAISSANCE LEARNING CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF JONATHAN DICKINSON ST PRK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVita Nova Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter Degeorge Family…Lost Tree Village Cha…Community Foundation …National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Peter Degeorge Family FoundationFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter Degeorge Family Foundation · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Vita Nova Inc: 42% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Pine School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Renaissance Learning Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter Degeorge’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home