Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peter Degeorge Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Philanthropy$24MHealth$1.7MCrime & Legal$453kYouth Development$90kAnimals$76kArts & Culture$25kInternational$10kEducation$5k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST$90,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 8 repeat orgs$557k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$25M
$557k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+41%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
HealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $956k · revenue +70% · 82% of their budget
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    2× · 2019–2021 · $26k · revenue +60%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • DS
    DEGEORGE ST TRAINING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $453k · 94% of their budget
  • WW
    WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Andrew Stergiopoulos Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Sir Philip Sidney Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Nicholas D Sergi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Shoot Down Kids Cancer Foundation
Health
5
The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
6
Orlando Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the orlando health foundation is to support the strategic priorities of orlando health through philanthropy. this is accomplished through special events and annual major and planned gift fundraising efforts.

Health
7
American Cancer Society Trust
8
Nick Simons Foundation International
Philanthropy
9
Peaceful Warrior Foundation

The peaceful warrior foundation is a non-profit organization with the aim of connecting our nation's warriors with the support and care they need.at peaceful warrior we strive to help our active-duty operators & veterans be at their very…

Human Services
10
Curepsp Inc

To raise awareness, build community, improve care and find a cure for psp, cbd and msa.

Health
11
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
12
The Peter Bullough Foundation Attn Katie Mooney
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Navy Seal Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST — $23,650,679 · PhilanthropyTHE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST+1 more — $6,500 · PhilanthropyCURETIVITY — $550,000 · OtherDEGEORGE ST TRAINING CENTER INC — $452,655 · OtherCAMO FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $955,735 · HealthELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Health+5 more — $17,500 · HealthTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $25,500 · AnimalsNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesKIDS GIVE TO KIDS — $10,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$23,657,179Other$1,147,655Health$1,123,235Animals$25,500Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$20,000Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST — $23,650,679 over 2y, 97% of budgetWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $955,735 over 3y, 82% of budgetDEGEORGE ST TRAINING CENTER INC — $452,655 over 1y, 94% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS GIVE TO KIDS — $10,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetTIPSY TURTLE FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCROSSROADS CLUB INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Foundation For Palm Beach Health Network Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Peter Degeorge Charitable TrustFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peter Degeorge Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peter Degeorge Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peter Degeorge Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph