How much did THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2025?

Arts & Culture$23MHealth$2.7MPublic Benefit$490kCrime & Legal$434kPhilanthropy$250kEducation$165kYouth Development$95kAnimals$75kHuman Services$70kOther$1.0M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

kids

2022

kids

2023

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $13k
$10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$250k+1 grant · $500k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
ANYTIME ALLSTARS$75,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND$25,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$20,000
JUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,790
VITA NOVA$10,000
OPERATION SANDCASTLE$7,500
SPAULDING REHABIITATION FOR BOSTON MARATHON$5,250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$27M · 13 repeat orgs$702k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$27M

$686k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%

+38%

Still filing today

62%

69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WH
WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION
5× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +344% · 33% of their budget
CF
CURETIVITY FOUNDATION
4× · 2021–2024 · $950k · revenue +371%
WC
WARRIORS CHOICE FOUNDATION
4× · 2021–2024 · $490k · revenue +399% · 90% of their budget

Funded once

JM
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +35%
UO
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMIgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +72%
NS
NAVY SEAL MUSEUM
one grant, 2023 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Buoniconti Fund to Cure

The mission of the organization is to raise money for, and awareness of, the miami project to cure paralysis, a center of excellence at the university of miami in miami, florida.

Health

Marine Mammal Care Center Los Angeles

To inspire ocean conservation through marine mammal rescue, rehabilitation, education, and research.

Animals

Autism Opportunities Foundation

We improve the lives of the people in our care affected by autism.

Health

Dolphin Research Center Inc

Relationship between marine mammals and humans.

Animals

Teamsters Local 25 Autism Fund Inc

To make donations and contributions, irrespective of corporate benefit or other benefit to the fund, to achieve and further the advancement of medical research seeking to cure autism, and to aid those currently afflicted.

Health

The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health

Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group, Inc. ("JMCPG") is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals.

Health

N of One

The mission is to facilitate, fund, and communicate breakthroughs in autism research that will lead to diagnostics, treatments, and prevention strategies based on an understanding of the underlying biology of autism.

Health

Autism Society of Greater Orlando

The mission or goal of the autism society of greater orlando, inc. (asgo) is that all individuals within the autism spectrum will be provided a lifetime network of opportunities to become fully accepted, included, and actively…

Health

Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services

Pug Rescue of Florida Inc

Rescue of Pug Pug Mix Breed Dogs

Animals

Pediatric Cancer Research Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the care, quality of life and survival rate of children with malignant diseases. the foundation raises funds to support state-of-the-art research that will ultimately lead to a cure for all childhood…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Autism Speaks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Expo Compositores Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 86% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/22

the rest of the field

14%

11,757/82,175

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

15/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Arts & Culture$22,580,000Health$2,722,074Other$1,245,788Public Benefit$490,369Crime & Legal$433,770Philanthropy$250,000Education$165,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter Degeorge Family FoundationFL13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter Degeorge Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WARRIORS CHOICE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814094917 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WARRIORS CHOICE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 90% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

THE PETER DEGEORGE CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Peter Degeorge Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph