· Private foundation
Peter Alfond Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $723k
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARAS | $200,000 |
| PLENITUD INICIATIVAS ECO-EDUCATIVAS INC | $175,000 |
| CORPORACION JUVENIL PARA EL DESAROLLO DE COMUNIDADES SOSTENIBLES | $170,000 |
| HEARTY ROOTS | $150,000 |
| CARAS | $130,000 |
| LEAD COLLABORATIVE | $116,610 |
| PORTLAND COMMUNITY SQUASH | $100,000 |
| PRODUCTORES DE CAFE DE PUERTO RICO INC | $100,000 |
| TREE STREET YOUTH | $100,000 |
| TREE STREET YOUTH | $100,000 |
| RURAL YOUTH INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| OUT MAINE | $100,000 |
| CORPORACION JUVENIL PARA EL DESAROLLO DE COMUNIDADES SOSTENIBLES | $79,429 |
| MIDCOAST COMMUNITY ALLIANCE DBA MIDCOAST YOUTH CENTER | $75,000 |
| HISPANIC FEDERATION INC | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $251k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC4× · 2020–2023 · $10M · revenue +318% · 80% of their budget
- AYALFOND YOUTH & COMMUNITY CENTER2× · 2020–2021 · $8.0M · revenue +138%
- CJCorp Juvenil para desarrollo de Comunidades Sostenibles3× · 2022–2024 · $715k · revenue +13% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- TFTURNER FARM PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $2.0M
- CJCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF PUERTO RICOone grant, 2023 · $150k
- GCGREEN CITY FORCE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
Cei integrates financing, small business and industry expertise, and policy solutions to grow a vibrant future for people and communities in maine and rural regions.
The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.
Secure a sustainable future for fisheries and fishing communities in Eastern Maine and beyond.
Focusmaine propels the growth of maine's most promising industries and transforms maine into a hub for top talent.
To empower displaced indigenous and Afro-Latinx peoples of Maine through survival programs, community power building, cultural celebration, and transformative healing practice.
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.
The Ecology School inspires stewardship of and connection to the natural world through experiential learning in ecology, conservation, farming, and sustainability.
MCAN catalyzes transformative education and action in response to the climate crisis. We seek to honor, unite and amplify the voices of youth, frontline communities, and others historically excluded from the climate conversation and…
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rural Youth Institute and the most unlike its peers is Rural Futures Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds ALFOND YOUTH & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PLATFORM FOR SOCIAL IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds Corp Juvenil para desarrollo de Comunidades Sostenibles ↗
- Who funds PLENITUD INICIATIVAS ECO-EDUCATIVAS INC ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTA TEEN CENTER OF THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds HEARTY ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds Jobs for Maine's Graduates Inc ↗
- Who funds TREE STREET YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds PRODUCTORES DE CAFE DE PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds Portland Community Squash ↗
- Who funds MAINE YOUTH THRIVING ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE COUNTY ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LEAD COLLABORATIVE PR INC ↗
- Who funds APOYO LEGAL AL EMPRENDIMIENTO COMUNITARIO INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE INITIATIVESINC ↗
- Who funds STERLING COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OUT Maine ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION CORTES INC ↗
- Who funds BANGOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PARA LA NATURALEZA INC ↗
- Who funds THE JANE STERN DORADO COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds Hand in Hand Mano en Mano ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST ↗
- Who funds WABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC ↗
- Who funds MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds MIDCOAST YOUTH CENTER & skatepark ↗
- Who funds MUJERES DE ISLAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · John T Gorman Foundation · Onion Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Hispanic Federation Inc · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Horizon Foundation Inc · Albert B Glickman Family Foundation · The Widgeon Point Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peter Alfond Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- World Learning Inc — 39% of income from government
- Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont — 31% of income from government
- Sterling College — 10% of income from government
- Governor Dummer Academy the Governor's Academy — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Rollins College — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peter Alfond Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Peter Alfond Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.