· Private foundation
The Pauline and Austin Neuhoff Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $233k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $132,800 |
| HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $100,000 |
| FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH | $45,000 |
| RIVER OF LIFE DALLAS CHURCH | $42,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF DALLAS INC | $25,000 |
| CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK | $18,400 |
| LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| TO BE LIKE ME | $15,000 |
| SEASIDE INTERFAITH CHAPEL | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SKY RANCH | $5,000 |
| DISCIPLES OF THE WAY MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| ST PAUL'S CATHEDRAL TRUST IN AMERICA | $5,000 |
| WOODALL RODGERS PARK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DADALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC6× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +47%
- BHBaylor Health Care System Foundation5× · 2017–2024 · $821k · revenue +80%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND9× · 2017–2025 · $820k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- UAUT AUSTINone grant, 2024 · $63k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINone grant, 2023 · $63k
- CCCLEMENTS CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITYone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
The Cambridge School of Dallas was formed in 2001 and is a college preparatory, non-denominational christian school established for the purpose of providing academic excellence in a christ-centered environment.
Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.
The mission of Dallas Theological Seminary is to glorify God by equipping godly servant-leaders for the proclamation of His Word and the building up of the body of Christ worldwide.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
Truth academy works in partnership with families to integrate high-quality education with biblical truth and discipleship in order to train students, spiritually and academically, how to operate in their god-given purpose and live out a…
National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.
The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.
Torah Day School of Dallas is a day school for jewish children grades kindergarden through eigth grade along with pre-school for one through four year old jewish children. The school provides a general studies and secular education meeting…
Dallas Bethlehem Center supports families living in our South Dallas/Fair Park neighborhood through education, health & wellness programs and technology supports.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is To Be Like Me and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds For the Nations Refugee Outreach ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP ↗
- Who funds INSPIRE SPACES INSPIRE STUDENTS ↗
- Who funds FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC ↗
- Who funds TO BE LIKE ME ↗
- Who funds DISCIPLES OF THE WAY ↗
- Who funds SKY RANCH AT UTE TRAIL INC ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK HIGH SCHOOL PTA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SKY RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Woodall Rodgers Park Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
- Who funds YOUTH BELIEVING IN CHANGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The New Covenant Foundation · The Dan and Martha Lou Beaird Foundation · The Perot Foundation · The Rosewood Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Foundation at Highland Park Presbyterian Church · Kershaw Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pauline and Austin Neuhoff Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Pauline and Austin Neuhoff Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Pauline and Austin Neuhoff Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.