· Public charity
The Foundation at Highland Park Presbyterian Church
To further the making of disciples of jesus christ by encouraging and building a culture of philanthropy to glorify god.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $565,512 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $584,150 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,638 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $212k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
- $250k+1 grant · $259k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HPPC CHILDRENS MINISTRY | $258,896 |
| HIGHLAND PARK PRESB CHURCH | $74,000 |
| WYCLIFFE MINISTRIES | $37,101 |
| HOPE UNLIMITED | $24,815 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| ANTIOCH PARTNERS | $20,000 |
| SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY AND LANGUAGE | $17,500 |
| HPPC CHURCH PLANT IN RESIDENCE | $17,000 |
| HPPC CALLING MINISTRY | $16,000 |
| PEAK STREET CHURCH | $15,000 |
| PARS THEOLOGICAL CENTRE | $15,000 |
| HPPC GRACE LAKE HIGHLANDS CHURCH | $10,000 |
| DALLAS CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORP | $10,000 |
| ESPERANZA MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| EXODUS MINISTRIES | $7,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $214k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE A PARTNERS DBA THE ANTIOCH PARTNERS8× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +43%
- CFCOUNCIL FOR LIFE7× · 2017–2023 · $105k · revenue +257%
- KCKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE5× · 2019–2023 · $75k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- STSCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY & LANGUAGE INone grant, 2022 · $20k
- CRCAPITOL REEF NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +62%
- FRFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCILone grant, 2019 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…
We offer hope and help to refugee, asylumseeking, and immigrant families in the Washington D.C. metro area. We provide educational programs that help families learn English. We provide practical assistance and connections to community…
Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.
Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community
To partner with other organizations to spread the gospel message of Jesus Christ through education, feeding, and medical support of the indigent/orphaned children of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.
Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.
The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.
Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ourcalling Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Hillier School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HILLIER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE A PARTNERS DBA THE ANTIOCH PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds Covenant Knights School ↗
- Who funds INSPIRE SPACES INSPIRE STUDENTS ↗
- Who funds HOPE UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds YOUTH BELIEVING IN CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds OURCALLING INC ↗
- Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
- Who funds IN MY SHOES INC ↗
- Who funds For the Nations Refugee Outreach ↗
- Who funds LIVADA ORPHAN CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL REEF NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dan and Martha Lou Beaird Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Pauline and Austin Neuhoff Foundation · Kershaw Foundation · Denman Family Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Morning Star Family Foundation · The New Covenant Foundation · Breunig Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Foundation at Highland Park Presbyterian Church funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.