· Private foundation
The Paul D Ware Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDTN | $18,120 |
| LLRMH | $9,525 |
| FIRST TEE | $8,700 |
| BLESSING CENTER | $5,500 |
| YOUTH HOPE FOUNDATION | $5,175 |
| VETERANS OF LOMA LINDA | $5,000 |
| IE LIGHTHOUSE OF THE BLIND | $4,200 |
| CRSI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FDTN | $2,826 |
| CHERRY VALLEY BOW HUNTERS | $2,200 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF REDLANDS | $2,105 |
| AQUINAS HIGH SCHOOL | $1,200 |
| REDLANDS OPTIMIST FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| TEAGAN ANSLEY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| REDLANDS BOWL PERFORMING ARTS | $500 |
| ASPCA | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +330%
- RCREDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL5× · 2021–2025 · $58k · revenue +11%
- RCREDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $21k · revenue +271%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
- MOMUSEUM OF REDLANDSone grant, 2021 · $3k
- CHCRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FDTNone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
To promote, administer, and conduct research and education at the va to improve the health and lives of veterans.
The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
Rady children's health (formerly rady children's hospital and health center (rchhc)) was formed to acquire, establish, maintain, conduct, operate, raise funds for, and otherwise support, directly or indirectly through its affiliates,…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Teagan Ansley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of Redlands ↗
- Who funds CRSI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Youth Hope Foundation ↗
- Who funds INLAND EMPIRE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds THE BLESSING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TEAGAN ANSLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS OPTIMIST CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS FOR VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MVW RELIEF FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Buster Family Foundation · Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation · Majestic Realty Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Paul D Ware Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.