· Private foundation
Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $286k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $398k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $153,000 |
| EASTERN OTTAWA YOUNG LIFE | $90,000 |
| MISSION EDGE-SWITCHFOOT BRO-AM FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS | $50,000 |
| PMBA | $50,000 |
| YUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOL | $49,995 |
| Individual grant recipient | $27,500 |
| CRU - UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $24,000 |
| ABIDE MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| HAND TO HAND | $20,000 |
| PRESCOTT CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $20,000 |
| STARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP | $20,000 |
| GEORGETOWN HARMONY HOMES | $20,000 |
| HUDSONVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ARROWHEAD UNITED WAY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
81 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GHGeorgetown Harmony Homes7× · 2018–2024 · $190k · revenue +55%
- B2BEYOND 26 INC7× · 2018–2024 · $153k · revenue +530% · 48% of their budget
- SSSTARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- MMEMBAone grant, 2022 · $50k
- HHHARMONY HOMESone grant, 2017 · $45k
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2018 · $33k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. To make low-cost home ownership available to low-income families.
We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…
The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.
Strengthens its community through assisting donors, making grants, and providing leadership.
To provide leadership, funding and operational support for projects that improve individual and community health status and well being in underserved communities.
To promote the commercial, industrial and civic welfare of the people of San Bernardino by encouraging the production and distribution of goods and services through the creation of more jobs and by enhancing the productivity and…
Provides complete professional dental services to uninsured and underinsured children between the ages of 3 to 18 living in the San Bernardino and surrounding communities including Colton, Highland and Muscoy. Services are provided for a…
With compassion, collaboration and commitment to action, vic provides services and program that engage and enrich the lives of older adults, families, and youth through a lens of inclusion to strengthen diverse communities in the valley
The Foundation's mission is to endeavor to support programs and projects that measurably improve the physical and emotional health and health, wholeness and hope is coupled with a vision to transform the well-being in Paradise, and the…
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is San Bernardino Valley Concert Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Georgetown Harmony Homes ↗
- Who funds BEYOND 26 INC ↗
- Who funds STARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP ↗
- Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
- Who funds ABIDE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Yavapai Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of Redlands ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SET FREE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEART OF NEIGHBORING ↗
- Who funds Santa Claus Inc of Greater San Bernardino ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Arrowhead United Way · Sempra Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Endowment · The Lossett Family Foundation · Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.