Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Buster Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$341kArts & Culture$151kHealth$127kPhilanthropy$52kHousing & Shelter$49kHuman Services$45kCommunity Improvement$31kYouth Development$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SET FREE CHURCH$105,000
IMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH$7,500
CINDY HESS YMCA MEMORIAL PARK$5,000
GLOCAL OUTREACH$5,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB$5,000
COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITION$2,500
CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN CENTER$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BLUE COLLAR ATHLETICS$1,000
FIRST TEE OF THE INLAND EMPIRE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%US VETS: $5k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S FUND: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
IN
CA
KY
VA
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$723k · 28 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
33

Total granted

$723k
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+24%

Still filing today

39%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Coachella Valley Housing Coalition
    4× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +40%
  • RC
    REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +200%
  • RC
    REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • RH
    REDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +330%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redland Foundation
Human Services
2
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
3
Adventist Health SystemWest

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
4
Friends of Tulare County

Friends of Tulare County is dedicated to promoting the safety, health, and well-being of all residents of Tulare County and strives to assist underrepresented and disadvantaged populations of all ethnicities and cultures through donations,…

Human Services
5
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Redwood Memorial Hospital

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

7
Inland Empire Rescue Mission Inc

Serve the least, the last and lost in the Inland Empire

8
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

9
Sharing & Caring

Sharing and Caring assists the poor and needy in the Tehachapi, California community through providing: 1) rent/shelter & utility payments; 2) food assistance; 3) holiday meals & holiday gifts for children & their families who would…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

11
Redlands Day Nursery

To provide quality early childhood education experiences and services for families in the greater redlands community, coupled with support for families as they develop parenting strategies, skills for independence and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Rhs Corp

Our mission is to promote an environment where members of our community can receive high quality care and services so they can maintain and be restored to good health.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Community Servi…Community Centers & Early C…Regional Theater & Performi…Law Enforcement Employee As…Affordable Housing & Shelte…Hospital Foundations and He…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr15%8%5–10yr18%24%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr10%12%35–55yr17%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr10%16%35–55yr17%47%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
16%
3,764/23,153

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH — $159,000 · OtherIMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCHSET FREE CHURCH — $133,500 · OtherSET FREE CHURCHLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL — $50,000 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALCAROLINE PARK ENDOWMENT FUND — $45,500 · OtherCAROLINE PARK ENDOWMENT FUNDOASIS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP — $30,000 · OtherREDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM — $25,000 · Other+48 more — $158,515 · Other+48 moreREDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 · Arts & CultureREDLANDS HISTOR…REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthREDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — $30,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthThe Coachella Valley Housing Coalition — $48,500 · Housing & ShelterFamily Service Association of Redlands — $15,360 · Human ServicesStater Bros Charities — $5,000 · Human ServicesGlocal Outreach — $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S FUND INC — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesKID SWAP RESTORE INC — $22,500 · Community ImprovementRedlands Police Community Foundation — $4,230 · Community ImprovementREDLANDS POLICE OFFICERS FOUNDATION — $1,865 · PhilanthropyTHE BLESSING CENTER INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$601,515Arts & Culture$125,000Health$61,000Housing & Shelter$48,500Human Services$32,860Community Improvement$26,730Philanthropy$2,865

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetThe Coachella Valley Housing Coalition — $48,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKID SWAP RESTORE INC — $22,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE — $18,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFamily Service Association of Redlands — $15,360 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStater Bros Charities — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlocal Outreach — $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRedlands Police Community Foundation — $4,230 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS EMPLOYEES BENEFIT ASSOC-CHARITY FUND — $2,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S FUND INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLESSING CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds The Coachella Valley Housing Coalition
  • Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
  • Who funds KID SWAP RESTORE INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE
  • Who funds Family Service Association of Redlands
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds Stater Bros Charities
  • Who funds Glocal Outreach
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Redlands Police Community Foundation
  • Who funds SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS EMPLOYEES BENEFIT ASSOC-CHARITY FUND
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Paul D Ware Foundation · The Jack H Brown Family Foundation · Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Buster Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph