Skip to content
The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc

The organization's mission is to provide quality cost effective outreach and education services for pregnant women, infants, children and families in new jersey.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$174k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.7MHealth$1.7MYouth Development$632kCrime & Legal$273kInternational$261kCommunity Improvement$254kFood & Nutrition$176kHousing & Shelter$145kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $689,745, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,149,212 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $459,467 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $477k
$45,095
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC$174,340
EMPOWER SOMERSET INC$88,698
PERINATAL HEALTH EQUITY FOUNDATION$81,040
WOMEN RISING INC$73,793
NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS$59,218
GREATER NEWARK HEALTH CARE COALITION INC$45,095
PROJECT SULF-SUFF OF SUSSEX CO$44,749
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY$43,750
RPACT$33,013
SOUTHERN NJ PERINATAL COOPERATIVE$24,275
HEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY$21,774
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY: $65k → 6%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $23k → 7%SOUTHERN NJ PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $50k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $282k → 12%PROJECT SULF-SUFF OF SUSSEX CO: $45k → 6%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $22k → 7%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $230k → 12%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER INC: $22k → 7%SOUTHERN NJ PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $50k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $106k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $20k → 16%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $6k → 7%SOUTHERN NJ PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $28k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $59k → 12%WILLING HEART COMMUNITY CENTER: $121k → 16%BERGEN FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $5k → 7%SOUTHERN NJ PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $24k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $58k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $174k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $48k → 12%WILLING HEART COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 16%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $47k → 12%NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $6k → 12%WOMEN RISING INC: $99k → 14%WILLING HEART COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 16%WOMEN RISING INC: $74k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $60k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $58k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $47k → 14%WOMENRISING INC: $33k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $27k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 24 repeat orgs$451k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$6.0M
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+30%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $836k · revenue +275% · 27% of their budget
  • SW
    SOUTH WARD ALLIANCE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $641k · revenue +68%
  • JP
    Jefferson Park Ministries Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $632k · revenue +107% · 25% of their budget

Funded once

  • EC
    ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $72k · revenue +5%
  • IC
    Ironbound Community Corporation
    one grant, 2023 · $65k · revenue 0%
  • N2
    NJ 2-1-1 PARTNERSHIP A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc

The organization's mission is to provide quality cost effective outreach and education services for pregnant women, infants, children and families in new jersey. the partnership for maternal and child health of northern new jersey, inc. is…

Human Services
2
Family Health Initiatives Inc

Our mission is to help hospitals, nonprofits and government improve the health and well being of communities.

Health
3
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
4
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
5
Princeton Healthcare System a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of princeton healthcare system is to provide exceptional, compassionate care to enhance the health and wellness of our patients, their families, and our community. princeton healthcare system provides inpatient and outpatient…

Health
6
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
7
Saint Peters Healthcare System Inc

Saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is a not for-profit holding company based in new brunswick, new jersey. saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is the sole corporate member of a number of not for-profit entities and the sole…

—
8
Visiting Nurse Assn of Central Jersey Personal Care

Visiting nurse association health group, inc. and affiliates, which includes the organization, are organizations dedicated to helping individuals and families in achieving their best level of well-being by providing compassionate,…

—
9
The Center for Prevention & Counseling

Our mission, since 1973, has been to promote hope, health and recovery among all people by creating an environment that is safe and free from the effects of substance use and addiction. the center provides substance use prevention,…

Health
10
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
11
Family Connections Inc

Growth happens here every day. with our counseling, skills-building, training and prevention services, people take control of their own healing and foster connections that make our entire community stronger, safer, and healthier.

Health
12
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ironbound Community Corporation; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $835,967 · Human ServicesNEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERSWOMEN RISING INC: $398,034 · Human ServicesWOMEN RISING INCBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $230,722 · Human ServicesBERGEN FAMILY CENTERThe Willing Heart Care Community Center Inc: $175,566 · Human ServicesThe Willing Heart Care Community Ce…CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $174,340 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICESPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC: $109,749 · Human ServicesPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX …+2 more: $71,543 · Human ServicesGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC: $591,000 · HealthGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES…PERINATAL HEALTH EQUITY FOUNDATION: $231,078 · HealthPERINATAL HEALTH EQUI…CENTRAL JERSEY FAMILY HEALTH CONSORTIUM INC: $151,785 · HealthCENTRAL JERSEY FAMILY…Greater Newark Health Care Coalition: $90,190 · HealthGreater Newark Health…SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $87,850 · HealthSOUTHERN NEW JERSEY P…HEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC: $64,387 · Health+1 more: $9,000 · HealthSOUTH WARD ALLIANCE: $640,892 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTH WARD ALL…ALLIANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $165,544 · Youth DevelopmentALLIANCE COMMU…YORK STREET PROJECT: $258,506 · OtherYORK STREET PROJEC…EMPOWER SOMERSET INC: $131,208 · OtherEMPOWER SOMERSET I…ELIZABETHPORT PRESBYTERIAN CENTER INC: $125,535 · OtherELIZABETHPORT PRES…ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH SYSTEM SUBORDINATE GROUP RETURN: $119,233 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HEALTH…Ironbound Community Corporation: $65,416 · OtherIronbound Communit…RPACT: $48,513 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $43,750 · OtherNew Community Corporation: $145,251 · OtherNew Community Corp…ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE: $72,432 · OtherESSEX COUNTY COLLE…+1 more: $14,812 · OtherJefferson Park Ministries Inc: $631,691 · Food & NutritionJefferson P…COMITE EN UNION PARA SALVADORENOS: $272,716 · InternationalCOMITE EN…International Rescue Committee INC: $184,378 · InternationalInternati…CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $76,460 · InternationalCHURCH WO…SPRING STREET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DBA TABLE OF HOPE: $188,779 · Community Improvement
Human Services$1,995,921Health$1,225,290Youth Development$806,436Other$1,024,656Food & Nutrition$631,691International$533,554Community Improvement$188,779

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW DESTINY FAMILY SUCCESS CENTERS: $835,967 over 8y, 27% of budgetSOUTH WARD ALLIANCE: $640,892 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetJefferson Park Ministries Inc: $631,691 over 3y, 25% of budgetGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC: $591,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWOMEN RISING INC: $398,034 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetCOMITE EN UNION PARA SALVADORENOS: $272,716 over 3y, 49% of budgetYORK STREET PROJECT: $258,506 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetPERINATAL HEALTH EQUITY FOUNDATION: $231,078 over 5y, 32% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $230,722 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetSPRING STREET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DBA TABLE OF HOPE: $188,779 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $184,378 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Willing Heart Care Community Center Inc: $175,566 over 3y, 31% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $174,340 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $165,544 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL JERSEY FAMILY HEALTH CONSORTIUM INC: $151,785 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNew Community Corporation: $145,251 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEMPOWER SOMERSET INC: $131,208 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HEALTH SYSTEM SUBORDINATE GROUP RETURN: $119,233 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC: $109,749 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGreater Newark Health Care Coalition: $90,190 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTHERN NEW JERSEY PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $87,850 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $76,460 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE: $72,432 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIronbound Community Corporation: $65,416 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC: $64,387 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNJ 2-1-1 PARTNERSHIP A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $51,318 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $20,225 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MONTCLAIR FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $14,812 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCentral Jersey Medical Center Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Columbia Bank Foundat…Community Food Bank O…The Hyde and Watson F…Investors Foundation …Greater Newark Health…Td Charitable Foundat…The Prudential Founda…The Provident Bank Fo…Schumann Fund for New…The Healthcare Founda…Victoria Foundation I…
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ40.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Greater Newark Health Care Coalition · Td Charitable Foundation · The Prudential Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Schumann Fund for New Jersey Inc · The Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey Inc · Victoria Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Ironbound Community Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • Empower Somerset Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Center for Family Services: 73% of income from government
  • Women Rising Inc: 59% of income from government
  • South Ward Alliance: 57% of income from government
  • York Street Project: 32% of income from government
  • Alliance Community Health Center Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Jefferson Park Ministries Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • Central Jersey Medical Center Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Urban League of Essex County: 20% of income from government
  • New Community Corporation: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home