Skip to content
The Overbrook Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Overbrook Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
160
Grants FY2024still arriving
28
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$19MPhilanthropy$16MCivil Rights$11MPublic Benefit$6.6MEducation$1.8MAnimals$1.5MCrime & Legal$1.5MInternational$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 160 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k41 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $914k
  • $50k–250k79 grants · $5.6M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.7M
$50,000
Median grant
28
States reached
$218M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Funds Inc$1,669,590
Environment America Research and Policy Center Inc$200,000
NEO Philanthropy$150,000
Mongabay Org Corp$150,000
The Lawyering Project$100,515
Billion Oyster Project$100,000
Free Election Fund a project of Hopewell Fund$100,000
Plastic Solutions Fund$100,000
Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS)$100,000
Brennan Center for Justice$100,000
Perpetual Use Inc$100,000
Voting Rights Lab$100,000
GreenWave Organization Corp$100,000
The Heartland Fund$100,000
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $696k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Bold Futures NM: $75k → 14%WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $50k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project Inc: $3k → 14%Center for Family Justice: $5k → 9%Kessler Foundation: $1k → 4%Bold Futures NM: $75k → 14%Women's Rights and Empowerment Network: $50k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project Inc: $1k → 14%The Center for Family Justice Inc: $2k → 9%Freedom House Detroit: $363 → 21%The Center for Family Justice Inc: $2k → 9%Resources for Human Development: $500 → 22%Center for Family Justice: $2k → 9%Bold Futures NM: $60k → 14%Boca West Childrens Foundation: $13k → 11%The Center for Family Justice Inc: $1k → 9%Neighbors Link: $500 → 9%Boca West Childrens Foundation: $500 → 11%Boca West Childrens Foundation: $500 → 11%Greg Hill Foundation: $3k → 8%Neighbors Link: $500 → 9%BOLD FUTURES NM: $40k → 14%Bold Futures NM: $35k → 14%Young Women United: $30k → 14%Young Women United: $25k → 14%Young Women United: $25k → 14%Al Otro Lado: $1k → 14%Bottomless Closet: $3k → 17%Bottomless Closet: $1k → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute: $8k → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $500 → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $500 → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $500 → 17%Hetrick-Martin Institute Inc: $500 → 17%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $500 → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $40k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $40k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $40k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $40k → 17%Compassion in World Farming Inc: $20k → 17%The New York State Youth Leadership Council: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 266 repeat orgs$7.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

266 repeat relationships: 104 still active in FY2024, 162 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

266
224

Total granted

$53M
$6.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+22%

Still filing today

77%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCivil RightsEducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MONGABAY ORG CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $951k · revenue +396%
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    8× · 2017–2024 · $831k · revenue +59%
  • BP
    BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $811k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • MV
    Movement Voter Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $1.6M
  • WISCONSIN VOICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $251k · revenue -89%
  • BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
9
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
10
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Osa Wildlife Sanctuary Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

422 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 422 of the 549 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
116
Early backer (in before they grew)
412/422
Grantees still filing
289/422
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FUNDS INC: $12,531,019 · OtherCOMMUNITY FUNDS INCPLASTIC SOLUTIONS FUND: $1,700,000 · OtherMovement Voter Fund: $1,550,000 · Other+96 more: $19,444,828 · Other+96 moreMONGABAY ORG CORP: $950,500 · EnvironmentMONGABAY ORG CORPNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $500,000 · EnvironmentCOMING CLEAN INC: $455,000 · EnvironmentGrist Magazine Inc: $450,000 · EnvironmentTHE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $450,000 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE: $430,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC: $400,000 · EnvironmentGlobal Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives: $400,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $350,762 · EnvironmentRainforest Action Network: $350,000 · EnvironmentSTAND: $350,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $340,000 · EnvironmentSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND: $330,000 · EnvironmentAmazon Watch Inc: $320,000 · Environment+27 more: $3,407,422 · Environment+27 morePREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $480,257 · Civil RightsPREGNANCY…LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $418,720 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LE…FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC: $375,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA R…Transgender Law Center: $356,000 · Civil RightsTransgend…THE OLE EDUCATION FUND: $330,000 · Civil RightsTHE OLE E…ONE ARIZONA: $275,000 · Civil RightsONE ARIZO…VOTER FORMATION PROJECT: $254,000 · Civil RightsWISCONSIN VOICES INC: $250,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM: $205,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $180,500 · Civil RightsJUST ASSOCIATES INC: $180,000 · Civil Rights+17 more: $1,611,500 · Civil Rights+17 morePROTEUS FUND INC: $1,592,602 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $676,500 · EducationBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $480,000 · EducationGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $340,000 · EducationMARINE CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $300,000 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $250,000 · EducationPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $200,000 · Education+3 more: $225,000 · EducationENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $490,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $445,000 · InternationalFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $425,000 · InternationalNational Economic and Social Rights Initiative: $200,000 · InternationalWITNESS INC: $200,000 · InternationalFRONT LINE USA FOUNDATION: $150,500 · InternationalROOT CAPITAL INC: $150,000 · InternationalMARALLIANCE: $105,000 · InternationalAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $90,000 · InternationalUS Human Rights Network: $90,000 · International+1 more: $60,000 · InternationalGroundswell Fund: $477,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $445,000 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $234,800 · PhilanthropyPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND: $180,000 · PhilanthropySD Foundation: $150,000 · PhilanthropyJUSTFUNDUS: $115,000 · PhilanthropyDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD: $602,500 · Public BenefitRepresentUs Education Fund: $295,000 · Public BenefitEarthworks: $295,000 · Public BenefitNEO Philanthropy Inc: $280,000 · Public BenefitWESTERN STATES CENTER: $125,000 · Public Benefit
Other$35,225,847Environment$9,483,684Civil Rights$4,916,477Education$4,064,102International$2,405,500Philanthropy$1,601,800Public Benefit$1,597,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $1,592,602 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP: $950,500 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $830,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY: $811,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $676,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $603,315 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD: $602,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetEnvironmental Defender Law Center: $545,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $500,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $490,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $480,257 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $480,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetGroundswell Fund: $477,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOMING CLEAN INC: $455,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc: $450,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTHE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT: $450,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $445,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $445,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE: $430,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $425,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $418,720 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC: $400,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGlobal Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives: $400,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetUPROSE INC: $400,000 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC: $375,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $370,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM: $365,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $356,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $350,762 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $350,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSTAND: $350,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetForward Together: $347,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $340,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $340,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $340,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND: $330,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND: $330,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $320,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $310,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $300,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $300,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetFOOD TANK THE THINK TANK FOR FOOD: $295,775 over 6y, 11% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund: $295,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetEarthworks: $295,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budget350ORG: $290,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $281,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPerpetual Use Inc: $280,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $280,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MONGABAY ORG CORP ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Defender Law Center ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell Fund ↗
  • Who funds COMING CLEAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Grist Magazine Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE STORY OF STUFF PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives ↗
  • Who funds UPROSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds BOLD FUTURES NM ↗
  • Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
  • Who funds STAND ↗
  • Who funds Forward Together ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…NEO Philanthropy IncWellspring Philanthro…Proteus Fund IncNew Venture FundThe Scherman Foundati…The Ford FoundationFreedom Together Foun…Foundation to Promote…Rockefeller Philanthr…Groundswell FundWallace Global Fund II
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC84× affinity97 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · New Venture Fund · The Scherman Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Freedom Together Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Groundswell Fund · Wallace Global Fund II

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Overbrook Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Overbrook Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Overbrook Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Overbrook Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 549 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Overbrook’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home