Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Olmsted-Taylor Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$146kEducation$117kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kHealth$58kReligion$45kEnvironment$40kFood & Nutrition$27kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$438k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$20,000
HUNT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$10,000
BRADFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,000
SENIOR SOURCE$5,000
SAINT MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
HOPE FOR CHILDREN OF TIGRAY$3,000
DALLAS ARBORETUM$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS DALLAS$1,000
CHILD CARE OF DALLAS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $3k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$523k · 23 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$523k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+44%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +26%
  • HV
    HUNT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $67k · revenue +862%
  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Dallas Operagraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +61%
  • CD
    Changing Destiny Project Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
3
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
4
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
5
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
6
Dallas Express Media

To provide unbiased, non-partisan news coverage for the city and county of Dallas.

Arts & Culture
7
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
8
Dallas Bar Association

The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…

—
9
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
10
Methodist Richardson Medical Center Foundation

To build and maintain donor relationships in order to raise, manage, and distribute funds to assist Methodist Health System in acquiring state-of-the-art technology, attracting excellent medical staff, and supporting vital hospital…

—
11
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
12
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizens of Greater Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dallas Morning News Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $110,000 · OtherSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INCCHILD CARE OF DALLAS: $28,000 · OtherCHILD CARE OF DALLASFOLDS OF HONOR: $25,000 · OtherFOLDS OF HONORUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERAUSTIN STREET SHELTER: $17,000 · OtherAUSTIN STREET SHELTERSAMARITAN MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · OtherBRADFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $13,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $11,000 · Other+15 more: $76,000 · Other+15 moreDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSIT…Southern Methodist University: $48,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Unive…ANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $18,000 · EducationANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTI…EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS: $6,000 · EducationHUNT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $67,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHUNT VOLUNTEE…DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentChanging Destiny Project Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES: $5,000 · PhilanthropyThe Dallas Opera: $6,500 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$315,000Education$122,000Public Safety & Disaster$67,000Environment$40,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$6,500Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $110,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHUNT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $67,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dallas Opera: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChanging Destiny Project Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISE ADVENTURES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Dallas Opera ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS ↗
  • Who funds Changing Destiny Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds RISE ADVENTURES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Olmsted-Taylor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Olmsted-Taylor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Olmsted-Taylor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph