Skip to content
The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$327kEducation$112kCrime & Legal$111kYouth Development$95kHousing & Shelter$88kFood & Nutrition$76kHealth$32kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARLY CONNECTIONS$15,000
CARE AND SHARE$15,000
THE PLACE$10,000
TRI-LAKES CARE$10,000
CASA - COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$10,000
COURT CARE$10,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT (CPCD)$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S LITERACY CENTER$10,000
THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE$8,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
KIDPOWER$5,000
SPECIAL KIDSSPECIAL FAMILIES$5,000
FORGE EVOLUTION$5,000
HILLSIDE CONNECTION$5,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $20k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $15k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $13k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $13k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $13k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $10k → 9%THE PLACE: $10k → 9%THE PLACE: $10k → 9%THE PLACE: $10k → 9%URBAN PEAK OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $10k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $10k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%URBAN PEAK OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $9k → 9%THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $9k → 9%THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $9k → 9%URBAN PEAK OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $8k → 9%URBAN PEAK OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $8k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $8k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $8k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $8k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $8k → 9%COURT CARE FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $7k → 9%URBAN PEAK OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $7k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $5k → 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $5k → 9%COURT CARE FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $5k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $5k → 9%COURT CARE FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $5k → 9%RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $3k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $2k → 9%ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $500 → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $10k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $9k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $6k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $6k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $5k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $4k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $3k → 9%MERCY'S GATE: $3k → 9%TESSA: $10k → 9%TESSA: $10k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARE: $10k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$982k · 28 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
14

Total granted

$982k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+31%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Care and Share Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +45%
  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +56%
  • CL
    Children's Literacy Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS PREGNANCY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +90%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HTE PIKES PEAK REGION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
2
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
3
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
4
The Pinon Project

The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.

Human Services
5
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
6
Elevating Connections

Elevating Connections is dedicated to building sustained positive relationships for current & former youth in foster care-including those experiencing sibling separation-to find their voice & build meaningful community connections.

Youth Development
7
Hearts & Lives

Addressing the needs of residents in the rim mountain communities through case management, direct services and referrals, and collaborating with governmental and nonprofit community resource providers.

Community Improvement
8
Colorado Casa Inc

Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.

Civil Rights
9
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
10
Our House Inc

Providing opportunities and environments to build bright futures. Our House provides residential and Day Program Services to adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The focus is on building independent living skills,…

Human Services
11
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
12
Friends of the Children - Colorado

Friends of the Children - Colorado has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Springs Child Nursery Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is One Nation Walking Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
28/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $79,500 · Human ServicesCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INCThe Place: $71,750 · Human ServicesThe PlaceTHE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INCTRI-LAKES CARES: $63,000 · Human ServicesTRI-LAKES CARESB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING: $63,000 · Human ServicesB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSIST…TESSA: $20,000 · Human ServicesCourt Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc: $17,000 · Human Services+3 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesCASA - COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $78,500 · OtherCASA - COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL AD…Individual grant recipient: $41,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEARLY CONNECTIONS: $30,000 · OtherEARLY CONNECTIONSCOURT CARE: $26,500 · OtherCOURT CAREKIDPOWER: $26,200 · OtherKIDPOWERLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO: $21,500 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLOR…PEAK EDUCATION - COS OR WP: $11,750 · OtherPartners in Housing Inc: $14,000 · Other+13 more: $53,100 · Other+13 moreChildren's Literacy Center Inc: $78,000 · EducationChildren's L…Atlas Preparatory School Inc: $30,500 · EducationAtlas Prepar…Peak Education: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $4,000 · EducationCare and Share Inc: $91,000 · Food & NutritionCare and …Forge Evolution: $39,000 · Crime & LegalCENTRO DE LA FAMILIA CENTRO DE LA FAMILIA: $25,500 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC: $9,100 · Crime & LegalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentHillside Connection: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentSpecial Kids-Special Families Inc: $26,000 · HealthNursing and Therapy Services of Colorado: $5,500 · Health
Human Services$383,750Other$302,550Education$117,500Food & Nutrition$91,000Crime & Legal$73,600Youth Development$35,500Health$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCare and Share Inc: $91,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $79,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Literacy Center Inc: $78,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetThe Place: $71,750 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES: $63,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetB COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING: $63,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetForge Evolution: $39,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetAtlas Preparatory School Inc: $30,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Kids-Special Families Inc: $26,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO DE LA FAMILIA CENTRO DE LA FAMILIA: $25,500 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO: $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTESSA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $19,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPartners in Housing Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHillside Connection: $13,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC: $9,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHomeward Pikes Peak: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNursing and Therapy Services of Colorado: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetPeak Education: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMercy's Gate: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Catamount Institute: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWomens Resource Agency Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Place ↗
  • Who funds THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES ↗
  • Who funds B COS WE CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRING ↗
  • Who funds Forge Evolution ↗
  • Who funds Atlas Preparatory School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Special Kids-Special Families Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO DE LA FAMILIA CENTRO DE LA FAMILIA ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds TESSA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds Court Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc ↗
  • Who funds Partners in Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hillside Connection ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Pikes Peak ↗
  • Who funds Nursing and Therapy Services of Colorado ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Peak Education ↗
  • Who funds GRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds Mercy's Gate ↗
  • Who funds Educating Children of Color Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLYING PIG FARM ↗
  • Who funds The Catamount Institute ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationColorado Springs Heal…The Joseph Henry Edmo…Pikes Peak Community …Pikes Peak United WayThe Myron Stratton Ho…Luther T McCauley Cha…The Hester E & Edwin …Carl W & Carrie Mae J…INDYGIVE DBA Give Pik…Colorado Gives Founda…The Marson Foundation
El Pomar FoundationCO52.7× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Pikes Peak United Way · The Myron Stratton Home · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Carl W & Carrie Mae Joslyn Charitable Trust · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Marson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nutrition Camp School Foundaton Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nutrition Camp School Foundaton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home