· Private foundation
The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $187k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $526k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAFI | $1,147,051 |
| SEACOLOGY | $164,770 |
| UNITED WAY OF UTAH | $100,000 |
| EBMRF | $98,417 |
| MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL | $62,485 |
| LIVING PLANET AQUARIUM | $50,000 |
| THANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| WELLS OF HOPE | $38,500 |
| MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| HUNGER FIGHT | $20,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $20,000 |
| MOTHERS WITHOUT BORDERS | $18,500 |
| NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| MADISON HOUSE AUTISM FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $249k · revenue +121%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2020–2023 · $157k · revenue +38%
- NINOW I CAN FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $147k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- IFINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION-PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $500k
- NNBCDIone grant, 2020 · $110k
- UWUNITED WAY OF UTAH COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…
Providing critical surgical care to children around the world while advancing education and training towards medical sufficiency in their communities.
Whole Child International promotes positive developmental outcomes for children through child protection systems strengthening and improving the quality of care for children in low- and middle-income countries.
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
A 503C3 Organization design to equip suffering girls and women around the world by helping them gain access to quality healthcare, education and economic empowerment initiatives aimed to foster self-este
KidZ at Heart International is a global Christian community that trains, partners with, and mobilizes networks of leaders to help children fall deeply in love with Jesus. We train and partner with churches and families to successfully…
Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…
The purpose of 'the children's mission' is to (1) educate the international community about the physical, educational and emotional needs of orphans and vulnerable children in malawi, africa; (2) raise funds to meet those needs; and (3)…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Village Book Builders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEACOLOGY ↗
- Who funds MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CharityVision International ↗
- Who funds MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL ↗
- Who funds THANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NOW I CAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LIVING PLANET INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Dresses For Orphans Inc ↗
- Who funds Educate ↗
- Who funds STITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds MAIA ↗
- Who funds AGNUS DEI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Elizabeth Smart Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation · The Miner Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Bill and Pat Child Family Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation · Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation · University Impact · The Community Foundation of Utah
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.