Skip to content
The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$6.4MInternational$2.8MEnvironment$1.5MPhilanthropy$888kHealth$511kCommunity Improvement$268kPublic Safety & Disaster$197kHuman Services$120kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $526k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFI$1,147,051
SEACOLOGY$164,770
UNITED WAY OF UTAH$100,000
EBMRF$98,417
MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL$62,485
LIVING PLANET AQUARIUM$50,000
THANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE$50,000
WELLS OF HOPE$38,500
MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HUNGER FIGHT$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$20,000
MOTHERS WITHOUT BORDERS$18,500
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER$10,000
WATTS OF LOVE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AGNUS DEI FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%RED CROSS: $55k → 14%KULTURE CITY: $5k → 16%STITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE: $23k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $48k → 14%STITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE: $15k → 8%RED CROSS: $35k → 14%STITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE: $5k → 8%A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%CAMP KESEM: $20k → 14%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 31 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
47

Total granted

$12M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+50%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $249k · revenue +121%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2020–2023 · $157k · revenue +38%
  • NI
    NOW I CAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $147k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • IF
    INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION-PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • N
    NBCDI
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF UTAH COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
2
Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids

Providing critical surgical care to children around the world while advancing education and training towards medical sufficiency in their communities.

Unclassified
3
Whole Child International

Whole Child International promotes positive developmental outcomes for children through child protection systems strengthening and improving the quality of care for children in low- and middle-income countries.

Youth Development
4
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
5
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
6
Global Girls Global Women Inc

A 503C3 Organization design to equip suffering girls and women around the world by helping them gain access to quality healthcare, education and economic empowerment initiatives aimed to foster self-este

Recreation & Sports
7
Kidz At Heart International

KidZ at Heart International is a global Christian community that trains, partners with, and mobilizes networks of leaders to help children fall deeply in love with Jesus. We train and partner with churches and families to successfully…

Religion
8
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
9
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
10
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
11
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
12
The Children's Mission Dba Malawi Children's Mission

The purpose of 'the children's mission' is to (1) educate the international community about the physical, educational and emotional needs of orphans and vulnerable children in malawi, africa; (2) raise funds to meet those needs; and (3)…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Village Book Builders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
30/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFI: $5,993,474 · OtherSAFISEACOLOGY: $1,365,376 · OtherSEACOLOGYINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION-PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $500,000 · OtherEBMRF: $474,059 · OtherUNITED WAY OF UTAH: $409,300 · Other+52 more: $1,984,962 · Other+52 moreMOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL: $654,747 · HealthNOW I CAN FOUNDATION: $146,500 · HealthHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Health+6 more: $51,500 · HealthCharityVision International: $399,000 · PhilanthropyANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $157,237 · Human ServicesSTITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE: $42,543 · Human ServicesAGNUS DEI FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Human ServicesElizabeth Smart Foundation: $30,000 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National: $20,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Indian Services: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $10,200 · Human ServicesMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL: $268,362 · Community ImprovementTHANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC: $249,000 · EnvironmentCONVOY OF HOPE: $57,838 · InternationalEducate: $45,000 · InternationalMAIA: $40,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $35,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $35,000 · InternationalWATTS OF LOVE: $10,000 · International+2 more: $9,900 · International
Other$10,727,171Health$882,747Philanthropy$439,000Human Services$354,980Community Improvement$268,362Environment$249,000International$232,738

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEACOLOGY: $1,365,376 over 5y, 10% of budgetMOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL: $654,747 over 4y, 43% of budgetCharityVision International: $399,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL: $268,362 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTHANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC: $249,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $157,237 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNOW I CAN FOUNDATION: $146,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTHE LIVING PLANET INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC: $47,500 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetEducate: $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDresses For Orphans Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetSTITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE: $42,543 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetMAIA: $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAGNUS DEI FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetElizabeth Smart Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetACCESS BOOKS: $30,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAlpine School District Foundation: $28,317 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTAND4KIND: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetKids on the Move Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGKOR HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMothers Without Borders: $18,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFOR THE KIDS ORG: $12,800 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMADISON HOUSE AUTISM FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Rachel Covey Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKultureCity: $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMY STORY MATTERS: $5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIDS' HAVEN A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCATCH Global Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILD WHATCOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDays For Girls International: $4,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEACOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CharityVision International ↗
  • Who funds MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NOW I CAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING PLANET INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE BOOK BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Educate ↗
  • Who funds Dresses For Orphans Inc ↗
  • Who funds STITCHING HEARTS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds MAIA ↗
  • Who funds AGNUS DEI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Smart Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…Larry H Miller and Ga…Beesley Family Founda…Thom & Gail Williamse…The Miner FoundationGeorge S and Dolores …Bill and Pat Child Fa…doTERRA Healing Hands…Clark and Christine I…Joan and Tim Fenton F…University ImpactThe Community Foundat…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT33.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation · The Miner Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Bill and Pat Child Family Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation · Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation · University Impact · The Community Foundation of Utah

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nu Skin Force for Good’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home