Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nord Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$773k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.3MInternational$970kEnvironment$636kCommunity Improvement$605kHuman Services$402kHealth$158kEducation$107kYouth Development$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $575k
$12,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Healing Waters$111,200
Reasons to Believe$84,000
TEARS$83,500
Christian World Outreach Inc$76,380
Foundation for the Nations$75,600
SERGE$73,880
CrossPurpose$70,000
AsOne Ministries$25,690
NYC International Project$20,000
Alpha USA$15,000
Global Health Ministries$15,000
CRU$15,000
Shepherd's Heart Ministry$12,000
Horizons International$10,020
Love Inc of Littleton$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($5.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($599k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AsOne Ministries: $30k → 5%AsOne Ministries: $26k → 5%AsOne Ministries: $25k → 5%AsOne Ministries: $25k → 5%AsOne Ministries: $20k → 5%AsOne Ministries: $10k → 5%The Inn Between: $15k → 8%The Denver Hospice: $15k → 12%THE INN BETWEEN: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
SD
PA
CA
UT
CO
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($599k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ireland$589k · 8 grants
Netherlands$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 45 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
17

Total granted

$5.3M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+29%

Still filing today

51%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CROSSPURPOSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $585k · revenue ×13
  • SG
    SERGE GLOBAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $473k · revenue +56%
  • AM
    AsOne Ministries
    6× · 2020–2025 · $136k · revenue +501%

Funded once

  • YF
    Youth for Christ International
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -1%
  • CI
    Christaid Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
4
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
5
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion
6
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
7
World Reach Inc

World reach is a global, evangelical missions organization serving fields in east africa, central and south america, europe and the u.s. our purpose is to fulfill the the great commission of jesus christ by reaching the world with the…

Religion
8
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
9
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
10
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
11
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
12
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Anchor International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Healing Waters: $635,664 · OtherHealing WatersFoundation for the Nations: $588,600 · OtherFoundation for the NationsSERGE GLOBAL INC: $472,683 · OtherSERGE GLOBAL INCNEW YORK CITY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT INC: $148,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT INCDENVER SEMINARY: $113,870 · OtherAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $120,150 · Other+33 more: $601,120 · Other+33 moreTEARS INC: $540,976 · EducationTEARS INCColorado Christian University: $39,700 · EducationColorado Chr…SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $20,715 · Education+1 more: $6,500 · EducationCROSSPURPOSE: $585,000 · Community ImprovementCROSSPURPOS…REASONS TO BELIEVE: $319,000 · ReligionREASONS TO …SHEPHERDS HEART MINISTRY: $108,600 · ReligionSHEPHERDS H…Alpha USA: $50,000 · ReligionAlpha USASAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S…+4 more: $44,361 · Religion+4 moreAsOne Ministries: $135,940 · Human ServicesAsOne Mini…Acts4 Community Outreach Services: $132,500 · Human ServicesActs4 Comm…DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $125,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RES…Horizons International: $77,450 · Human ServicesHorizons I…THE INN BETWEEN: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $30,000 · Human Services+2 moreCHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH: $449,354 · EmploymentCHRISTIAN…GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES: $95,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 · InternationalONECHILD GLOBAL: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $6,000 · International
Other$2,680,087Education$607,891Community Improvement$585,000Religion$561,961Human Services$525,890Employment$449,354International$141,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSPURPOSE: $585,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetTEARS INC: $540,976 over 9y, 32% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC: $472,683 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH: $449,354 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetREASONS TO BELIEVE: $319,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAsOne Ministries: $135,940 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetActs4 Community Outreach Services: $132,500 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $125,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $120,150 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetSHEPHERDS HEART MINISTRY: $108,600 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES: $95,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHorizons International: $77,450 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAlpha USA: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $39,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $20,715 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrphanos Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKS MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINE ALASKA INC: $8,861 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEURASIA PARTNERS NETWORK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds TEARS INC ↗
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds REASONS TO BELIEVE ↗
  • Who funds AsOne Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Acts4 Community Outreach Services ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS HEART MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Horizons International ↗
  • Who funds Alpha USA ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Orphanos Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Servant Foundation · Tyl Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Denver Foundation · The New Horizons Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Eugene C and Florence Armstrong Family Foundation Inc · Adolph Coors Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nord Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nord Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nord Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Nord Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nord’s filings →

More from the funding graph