Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Neil Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$21kHuman Services$4kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$1kHealth$745Philanthropy$250Recreation & Sports$100International$75Other$0
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTHER TERESA HOME$2,100
Individual grant recipient$1,645
FOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO$1,625
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,200
OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INC$1,000
ST MICHAEL'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
CANISIUS HIGH SCHOOL$150
ADVANCING CTNNB1 CURES AND TREATMENTS INC$100
ST LOUIS CHURCH$100
NATAVITY MIGUEL SCHOOL OF BUFFALO$100
CARDINAL O'HARA HIGH SCHOOL$50
CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF WEST BUFFALO$25
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$25
Individual grant recipient$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $50 → 10%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $50 → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $50 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 18 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$26k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+96%

Still filing today

17%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UT
    UPON THIS ROCK
    2× · 2018–2019 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k
  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO
    2× · 2018–2020 · $3k

Funded once

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE BUFFALO DIOCESE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • T1
    THE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +463%
  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING SEMINARY
    one grant, 2019 · $175
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Mercy Hospital Foundation

Mercy hospital foundation,inc. is a charitable, not-for-profit 501(c) 3 corporation with the purpose of raising new funds and stewarding resources which support, improve and promote the care and services provided by mercy hospital of…

Philanthropy
3
Catholic Health System Continuing Care Foundation

The continuing care foundation is a charitable, not-for-profit 501(c) 3 corporation with the sole purpose of raising funds for the benefit of catholic health system home and community based care western new york.

Health
4
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
7
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
12
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Foundation of Wny Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPON THIS ROCK: $12,000 · OtherUPON THIS ROCKIndividual grant recipient: $4,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: $2,920 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALOFOUNDATION OF THE BUFFALO DIOCESE: $2,900 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE BUFFALO DIOCESEMOTHER TERESA HOME: $2,100 · OtherMOTHER TERESA HOMECATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1,400 · OtherN A R D I N ACADEMY: $1,200 · Other+22 more: $6,065 · Other+22 moreTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC: $250 · PhilanthropyROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $150 · PhilanthropyHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC: $100 · PhilanthropyCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $100 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $50 · Human ServicesChesterton Academy of Buffalo: $100 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50 · EducationCTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc: $100 · Health
Other$33,010Philanthropy$500Human Services$150Education$150Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE ROWING CLUB INCORPORATED OF THE CITY OF BUFFALO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR THE POOR INC: $40 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE ROWING CLUB INCORPORATED OF THE CITY OF BUFFALO ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc ↗
  • Who funds Chesterton Academy of Buffalo ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Neil Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Neil Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neil Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph