Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Neil Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Religion$21kHuman Services$4kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$1kHealth$745Philanthropy$250Recreation & Sports$100International$75Other$0
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$150
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTHER TERESA HOME$2,100
Individual grant recipient$1,645
FOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO$1,625
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,200
OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INC$1,000
ST MICHAEL'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
CANISIUS HIGH SCHOOL$150
ADVANCING CTNNB1 CURES AND TREATMENTS INC$100
NATAVITY MIGUEL SCHOOL OF BUFFALO$100
ST LOUIS CHURCH$100
CARDINAL O'HARA HIGH SCHOOL$50
CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF WEST BUFFALO$25
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$25
Individual grant recipient$25
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT: $50 → 10%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $50 → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $50 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26k · 18 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$26k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+96%

Still filing today

17%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UT
    UPON THIS ROCK
    2× · 2018–2019 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k
  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO
    2× · 2018–2020 · $3k

Funded once

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE BUFFALO DIOCESE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • T1
    THE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +463%
  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING SEMINARY
    one grant, 2019 · $175

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Mercy Hospital Foundation

Mercy hospital foundation,inc. is a charitable, not-for-profit 501(c) 3 corporation with the purpose of raising new funds and stewarding resources which support, improve and promote the care and services provided by mercy hospital of…

Philanthropy
3
Catholic Health System Continuing Care Foundation

The continuing care foundation is a charitable, not-for-profit 501(c) 3 corporation with the sole purpose of raising funds for the benefit of catholic health system home and community based care western new york.

Health
4
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
7
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

11
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

12
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Foundation of Wny Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UPON THIS ROCK — $12,000 · OtherUPON THIS ROCKIndividual grant recipient — $4,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALO — $2,920 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE RC DIOCESE OF BUFFALOFOUNDATION OF THE BUFFALO DIOCESE — $2,900 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE BUFFALO DIOCESEMOTHER TERESA HOME — $2,100 · OtherMOTHER TERESA HOMECATHOLIC CHARITIES — $1,400 · OtherN A R D I N ACADEMY — $1,200 · Other+22 more — $6,065 · Other+22 moreTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC — $250 · PhilanthropyROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $150 · PhilanthropyHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC — $100 · PhilanthropyCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC — $100 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT — $50 · Human ServicesChesterton Academy of Buffalo — $100 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $50 · EducationCTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc — $100 · Health
Other$33,010Philanthropy$500Human Services$150Education$150Health$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE ROWING CLUB INCORPORATED OF THE CITY OF BUFFALO — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT — $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE POOR INC — $40 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WEST SIDE ROWING CLUB INCORPORATED OF THE CITY OF BUFFALO
  • Who funds HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF WNY INC
  • Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc
  • Who funds Chesterton Academy of Buffalo
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN WIDOW PROJECT
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Neil Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph