Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mulva Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$15M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$32MReligion$30MArts & Culture$11MHealth$11MHousing & Shelter$5.5MHuman Services$2.3MScience & Tech$2.0MFood & Nutrition$225kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $684
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $668k
  • $250k+12 grants · $25M
$320,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$541M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSIONARIES OF THE WORD$14,957,805
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$3,000,000
ST JOHN'S MINISTRIES$1,200,000
UT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,000,000
UT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$940,000
PONTIFICAL NORTH AMERICAN COLLEGE$914,400
THE GATEWAY COLLECTIVE$500,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$500,000
GOLDEN HOUSE$400,000
ST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC$320,000
NOTRE DAME DE LA BAIE ACADEMY$300,000
SYBLE HOPP SCHOOL$200,000
DIOCESE OF RENO$154,435
HOPE HOUSE$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GOLDEN HOUSE: $300k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $300k → 10%MANNA FOR LIFE MINISTRIES: $75k → 10%MANNA FOR LIFE MINISTRIES: $50k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $10k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $100k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $100k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $100k → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NV
CO
MO
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of The Mulva Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 52%.

The Mulva Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84M · 36 repeat orgs$9.7M to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
10

Total granted

$84M
$7.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+70%

Still filing today

47%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MISSIONARIES OF THE WORD INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15M · revenue ×19 · 98% of their budget
  • ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $7.0M · revenue +8%
  • SG
    ST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $564k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • DP
    DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue +58% · 37% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2.4M
  • CF
    CATHOLIC FDN FOR DIOCESE GREEN BAY
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jesus House Inc

Food and shelter to the homeless and groceries/clothing assistance to poverty stricken households

Human Services
2
St Vincents House

Service agency providing comprehensive social services and community outreach programs for the entire family. st. vincent's house serves the disadvantaged, underserved and working poor population of the greater galveston community with…

Human Services
3
Manna of Life Ministries

Manna of life ministries, inc. is a non-for-profit faith based program dedicated to serving the homeless and destitute. our goal is to address their immediate hunger needs and ultimately, to emplower them to reverse their current situation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Pope Francis Center

Pope francis center provides holistic, transformational, solutions to people experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
5
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

—
6
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
7
House of Mercy Inc

To provide safe shelter, compassionate support, and pathways to stability for those who are homeless and most vulnerable in our community.

Human Services
8
House of John Inc

To provide care for the terminally ill

Health
9
Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter
10
Freedom House Ministries Inc

We are a christ-centered community of staff and volunteers that provides shelter to families.

Housing & Shelter
11
St Gianna's Place Inc

St. gianna's place is a safe, god-centered home for pregnant women and their children. it lovingly provides comprehensive services that empower residents to grow in hope and confidence, cultivate their dedication to motherhood, advance…

Human Services
12
Volunteer Ministry Center

To work with homeless individuals so that they achieve housing and access to supportive services. also, the organization works to prevent homelessness for marginally housed individuals.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gateway Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is De Pere Cultural Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $17,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINMISSIONARIES OF THE WORD INC: $15,339,155 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF THE WORD INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATI: $8,000,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATIUT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $6,000,000 · OtherUT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTIN: $4,800,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTINMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $4,000,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $2,400,000 · Other+30 more: $12,127,510 · Other+30 moreST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $7,000,000 · EducationST NORBERT COLL…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF O…ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $4,800,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GATEWAY COLLECTIVE INC: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterDE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesMANNA FOR LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $125,000 · Human Services+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC: $563,925 · HealthHOPE HOUSE INC: $300,000 · HealthAUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC: $100,000 · HealthPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $225,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$69,666,665Education$13,000,000Housing & Shelter$5,500,000Arts & Culture$3,175,000Human Services$1,445,000Health$963,925Food & Nutrition$225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSIONARIES OF THE WORD INC: $15,339,155 over 3y, 98% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $7,000,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $4,800,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetDE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC: $563,925 over 2y, 18% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central Texas: $500,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTHE GATEWAY COLLECTIVE INC: $500,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetJOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC: $300,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetCASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $275,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $225,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE JOURNEY HOME INC: $150,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMANNA FOR LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $125,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetAUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFoster the Village Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSIONARIES OF THE WORD INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DE PERE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Central Texas ↗
  • Who funds THE GATEWAY COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA ALBA MELANIE HISPANIC COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOR LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay Community Foundation IncWI25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Weyers Family Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Wangerin Family Foundation Inc · Rosemary L & John P Mortensen Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mulva Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mulva Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mulva Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mulva Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mulva Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph