How much did JOSEPH & SARAH VAN DRISSE CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of JOSEPH & SARAH VAN DRISSE CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

partnershipmuseum

2023

partnership

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $3k
$10k–50k23 grants · $325k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
AWAKEN INC$20,000
NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER$15,000
ANGEL FUND FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER$15,000
SYBLE HOPP SCHOOL$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREEN BAY$15,000
CASA ALBA MELANIE$15,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEASTERN$15,000
ASPIRO INC$15,000
Family Services of Northeastern$15,000
YWCA$15,000
Pauls Pantry Inc$15,000
ORAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$15,000
FREEDOM HOUSE$15,000
ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.8M · 36 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.8M

$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

+112%

Still filing today

50%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NC
NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +106%
SG
ST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC
5× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +2059%
AI
ASPIRO INC
7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +22%

Funded once

ST NORBERT COLLEGE
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -11%
BAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +300%
ND
NOTRE DAME DE LA BAIE ACADEMY INC
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Downtown Green Bay Inc

Dgbi works to revitalize the social and economic climate of downtown green bay.

Youth Development

House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope offers a safe, supportive place where young parents and children experiencing homelessness will become confident, independent, and successful members of our community.

—

Greater Green Bay Chamber of Commerce

Strengthen member businesses, enhance economic and workforce development, and improve the quality of life in our community an region.

Community Improvement

New Community Shelter Foundation Inc

To benefit and support the greater green bay community foundation, inc. primarily for the new community shelter or similar organizations which serve the homeless in brown county wi.

Housing & Shelter

Greater Green Bay Habitat for Humanity

Bringing people together to build homes, communities, and hope in the green bay area.

—

Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and

Create opportunities for people with barriers through training, employment, and supportive services

—

Lgbt Center of Se Wisconsin

Empowering se wisconsin to create a thriving, safe and inclusive community where lgbtq+ people are welcomed & affirmed.

—

Greater Green Bay Chamber of Commerce

To strengthen member businesses, enhance economic and workforce development, and improve the quality of life in our community and region.

—

Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northwestern Wisconsin Inc

Create and support one to one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth

—

Greater Green Bay Community

A regional foundation serving a broad range of philanthropic interests primarily benefiting the greater green bay region including brown, kewaunee, and oconto counties along with others having economic, cultural and community ties with the…

Philanthropy

Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St John the Evangelist Homeless and the most unlike its peers is St Norbert College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 5% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/22

the rest of the field

65/1,228

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

20/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,158,000Housing & Shelter$235,000Education$170,000Health$145,000Youth Development$65,000Arts & Culture$60,000Food & Nutrition$57,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay CommunityWI42.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community · Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Cornerstone Foundation Of · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 · Brown County United Way · Weyers Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley · Hurckman Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOSEPH & SARAH VAN DRISSE CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 21.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 465384168 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ST GIANNA MOLLA CLINIC INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOSEPH & SARAH VAN DRISSE CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

JOSEPH & SARAH VAN DRISSE CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Joseph & Sarah Van Drisse Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph