· Private foundation
The Morton and Barbara Mandel Foundation Family Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
52% of The Morton and Barbara Mandel Foundation Family Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Brandeis University, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 59 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Morton and Barbara Mandel Foundation Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 61 organizations, $19M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k8 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k97 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k28 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+3 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| American Friends of the Hebrew University | $10,000,000 |
| Brandeis University | $3,333,333 |
| Tzedek Social Justice Fund | $1,131,117 |
| United Way of Summit & Medina | $200,000 |
| Stewart's Caring Place | $125,000 |
| American Friends of the Hebrew University | $125,000 |
| American Friends of the Hebrew University | $125,000 |
| Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County | $100,000 |
| New Israel Fund | $100,000 |
| American Friends of the Hebrew University | $100,000 |
| Ferd & Gladys Alpert Jewish Family & Children's Se | $100,000 |
| Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County | $100,000 |
| Case Western Reserve University | $100,000 |
| Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County | $100,000 |
| United Way of Summit & Medina | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $618k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTzedek Social Justice Fund2× · 2020–2021 · $1.6M · revenue +207% · 92% of their budget
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND2× · 2020–2021 · $450k · revenue +44%
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY2× · 2020–2021 · $350k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- TOTown of Palm Beachone grant, 2021 · $228k
- FGFerd & Gladys Alpert Jewish Family & Children's Seone grant, 2020 · $100k
- UAUNC Asheville Foundationone grant, 2021 · $93k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.
Equality florida institute is the educational arm of the largest civil rights organization in florida dedicated to ending discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
To support the work of the amercian civil liberties union of louisiana through litigation, public education and limited lobbying in support of civil liberties.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
The american civil liberties union foundation of northern california (aclu nc foundation) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc foundation, a california…
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Lgbtq Task Force and the most unlike its peers is Tzedek Social Justice Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Tzedek Social Justice Fund ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SUMMIT AND MEDINA ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY BOARD OF AKRON ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EAGLE MARKET STREETS DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Colaborativa La Milpa ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds KL TRAINING SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY INNOVATORS INC ↗
- Who funds TRANZMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Campaign For Southern Equality ↗
- Who funds Center for Participatory Change ↗
- Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FEDERATION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Comprehensive Alcoholism Rehabilitation Programs ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds YTL TRAINING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA JEWS FOR JUSTICE GOLDSTEIN ↗
- Who funds CLUB OASIS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OUTRIGHT WNC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · United Way of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc · Laughing Gull Foundation · Community Foundation of Henderson County Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Southern Vision Alliance · Blueprint North Carolina · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Morton and Barbara Mandel Foundation Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Black Justice Coalition Inc — 17% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Palm Beach Day Academy Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Morton and Barbara Mandel Foundation Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Morton and Barbara Mandel Foundation Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.