Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Moran Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$932k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$228k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.2MHealth$1.7MHuman Services$1.6MEducation$659kYouth Development$529kArts & Culture$262kPhilanthropy$259kCrime & Legal$210kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $267k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $595k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$228,000
NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH$150,000
SOUPMOBILE$85,000
SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION$75,000
NAVARRO COUNTY YOUTH EXPOSITION$57,170
COMPASSION CORSICANA$40,000
HOPE FOR THE HEART$25,000
METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME$20,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF NAVARRO COUNTY$17,000
UNITED WAY$15,000
WISEMAN MINISTRIES$15,000
HEART TRANSFORMATION$15,000
HOPE CENTER$15,000
LIFEWISE INC$15,000
WAREHOUSE LIVING ARTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $868k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASTING NO STONES: $10k → 9%CROSS CREEK MEADOWS: $3k → 19%CASTING NO STONES: $5k → 9%CASTING NO STONES: $5k → 9%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $75k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 9%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 9%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 9%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 9%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 9%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 16%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 16%SOUPMOBILE: $150k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $85k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $75k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $75k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $75k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $50k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $50k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $50k → 14%SOUPMOBILE: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
OH
CA
CO
AZ
AR
TN
NC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 62 repeat orgs$354k to everyone else

62 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
31

Total granted

$7.5M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+53%

Still filing today

29%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $785k · revenue +27%
  • SI
    SOUPMOBILE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $630k · revenue +2%
  • WM
    WISEMAN MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • GC
    GOLDEN CIRCLE SCHOLARSHIP ACCOUNT
    one grant, 2017 · $80k
  • TC
    THE CARROLL MORAN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +163%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Narroway Productions Inc

To inspire greatness and instill virtue in people of all ages by creating world-class christian entertainment

Religion
2
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
3
Meals On Wheels North Central Texas Inc

Organization provides services to senior citizens and the disabled, primarily through home-delivered meals and congregate meals.

Human Services
4
Sharing Hope Ministry Inc

Providing christ-centered recovery material and aftercare services to women across the nation who are incarcerated or who reside in addiction recovery facilitites.

Religion
5
El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission

El Buen Samaritano an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas serving the Latino community of Central Texas is committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that…

—
6
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
7
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
8
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
9
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
10
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

—
11
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
12
Texas Palliative Care

Texas palliative care operates to strengthen and further the goals and purpose of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifewise Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope for the Heart. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $1,468,253 · OtherNORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCHNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $685,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATIONNAVARRO COUNTY YOUTH EXPOSITION: $439,365 · OtherNAVARRO COUNTY YOUTH EXPOSITIONCOMPASSION CORSICANA: $435,000 · OtherCOMPASSION CORSICANAYMCA: $245,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $210,150 · Other+75 more: $2,018,475 · Other+75 moreTHE SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION INC: $785,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SEENA MAG…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED…SOUPMOBILE INC: $630,000 · Human ServicesSOUPMOBILE I…METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $180,000 · Human ServicesMETHODIST CH…MEALS ON WHEELS: $35,000 · Human Services+3 more: $27,500 · Human ServicesWISEMAN MINISTRIES INC: $290,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $30,000 · ReligionLOVE GOD GREATLY INC: $25,000 · ReligionCommunity Bible Study: $15,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionNAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $243,000 · EducationTEXAS STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $45,000 · EducationDucks Unlimited Inc: $46,580 · EnvironmentNAVARRO COUNCIL OF THE ARTS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEnnis Public Theatre: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,501,243Philanthropy$935,000Human Services$872,500Religion$362,000Education$288,000Environment$46,580Arts & Culture$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION INC: $785,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetSOUPMOBILE INC: $630,000 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetWISEMAN MINISTRIES INC: $290,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetNAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $243,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $180,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $107,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE FOR THE HEART: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $46,580 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $45,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $35,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE GOD GREATLY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASTING NO STONES INC: $20,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAVARRO COUNCIL OF THE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $15,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEnnis Public Theatre: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSTATE FAIR OF TEXAS: $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetNAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOutdoor Adventures for Wounded Veterans Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetCROSS CREEK MEADOWS: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNavarro County 4-H Shotgun Club: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUPMOBILE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISEMAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR THE HEART ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J Tom Eady Charitable TrustTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J Tom Eady Charitable Trust · Faye Murray & Mae Wardlaw Charitable Foundation · Pearl Thornell Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moran Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moran Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Moran Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Moran Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moran Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph