Skip to content
The Moody Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Moody Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$121M
Granted FY2024still arriving
373
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$277MRecreation & Sports$100MHealth$40MArts & Culture$38MHuman Services$34MYouth Development$12MEnvironment$9.8MCrime & Legal$8.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 373 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $138k
  • $10k–50k96 grants · $2.5M
  • $50k–250k176 grants · $17M
  • $250k+68 grants · $101M
$70,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Texas at Austin Dept of Intercollegiate Athletics$30,000,000
Rice University$10,000,000
Southern Methodist University$10,000,000
Moody Gardens$7,000,000
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston$5,000,000
Children's Medical Center Foundation$3,313,577
Lubbock County Expo Center$2,000,000
Galveston Island Day SchoolMoody Early Childhood Center$1,966,666
Charles Butt Foundation$1,863,500
Abilene Christian University$1,800,000
Galveston Independent School District$1,349,791
Waco Family Medicine Foundation$1,250,000
Communities Foundation of Texas Inc$1,000,000
Texas Community College Education Initiative$1,000,000
Breakthrough Central Texas$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $24.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Community Resource Centers Of Texas: $116k → 9%Interfaith Family Services: $100k → 9%Rahabs Retreat And Ranch: $160k → 16%Camp Aranzazu: $150k → 17%Uvalde CISD Moving Forward Foundation: $1.0M → 25%Rahabs Retreat And Ranch Inc: $100k → 16%Early Learning Center Of Lubbock Inc: $150k → 17%Austin Groups for the Elderly: $250k → 10%Texas Girls and Boys Ranch: $100k → 17%Galveston County Teen Parenting Coalition GCTPC: $135k → 14%YMCA of Abilene: $100k → 16%Denton Assistance Center: $100k → 8%HRA Village: $127k → 14%Lena Pope Home Inc: $300k → 11%Galveston County Food Bank: $500k → 14%Galveston County Food Bank: $100k → 14%Galveston Urban Ministries: $2.0M → 14%Respite Care of San Antonio: $250k → 16%Jewish Family Service of Dallas Inc: $100k → 14%Jewish Family Service of Greater Dallas Inc: $100k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $250k → 14%Galveston Urban Ministries: $150k → 14%Resource and Crisis Center of Galveston County: $100k → 14%Family Service Center of Galveston County: $100k → 14%Hope Supply Co: $375k → 14%Behind Every Door: $260k → 14%Mommies in Need: $150k → 14%Mommies in Need DBA Annie's Place: $125k → 14%Libbie's Place: $100k → 14%Women In Need of Generous Support: $1.0M → 14%Women In Need of Generous Support: $100k → 14%Child Protective Services Community Partners IncCommunity Partners of Dal: $125k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: $750k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: $750k → 14%YMCA of Austin: $3.1M → 10%Kid Net FoundationJonathan's Place: $150k → 14%Kid Net FoundationJonathan's Place: $120k → 14%Family Eldercare Inc: $225k → 10%Family Place: $150k → 14%Family Eldercare Inc: $225k → 10%Family Place Inc: $125k → 14%Family Eldercare: $150k → 10%Genesis Women's Shelter and Support: $494k → 14%Deliver Fund: $375k → 14%Encore Park Dallas: $1.7M → 14%Buckner Children and Family Services: $125k → 14%Real Estate Council Community Fund: $125k → 14%American National Red Cross: $150k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
KS
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The Moody Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Moody Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429M · 325 repeat orgs$129M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

325 repeat relationships: 152 still active in FY2024, 173 since wound down; 184 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

325
502

Total granted

$429M
$55M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+9%

Still filing today

83%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Southern Methodist University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $100M · revenue +37%
  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60M · revenue +28%
  • GC
    Galveston College Foundation
    2× · 2019–2022 · $6.5M · revenue +238% · 71% of their budget

Funded once

  • UA
    UT at AustinDept of Intercollegiate Athletics
    one grant, 2021 · $6.5M
  • TG
    THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $4.0M · revenue -13%
  • UB
    UT - Blanton Museum of Art
    one grant, 2019 · $4.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
4
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

—
5
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
6
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
7
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
8
Texas Defender Service

See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…

Civil Rights
9
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
10
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
11
Texas Legal Services Center Inc

Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…

Crime & Legal
12
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Galveston Artist Residency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

733 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 733 of the 1,021 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

54
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
135
Early backer (in before they grew)
711/733
Grantees still filing
440/733
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Texas at AustinDept of Intercollegiate Athletics: $53,000,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas at AustinDept of Intercollegiate At…University of Texas at Austin Dept of Intercollegiate Athletics: $30,000,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas at Austin Dept of Intercollegiate A…UT - Dept of Intercollegiate Athlet: $19,500,000 · OtherUT - Dept of Intercollegiate AthletGalveston ISD: $16,543,286 · OtherGalveston ISDGalveston Independent School Distri: $10,816,476 · Other+107 more: $121,248,555 · Other+107 moreSouthern Methodist University: $100,000,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist UniversityWilliam Marsh Rice University: $60,035,000 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice UniversityMOODY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $7,888,666 · Education+28 more: $35,463,002 · Education+28 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN: $3,175,000 · Human ServicesGalveston Urban Ministries: $2,361,000 · Human ServicesEncore Park Dallas: $1,800,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,640,000 · Human ServicesASCEND DALLAS: $1,200,000 · Human ServicesUvalde CISD Moving Forward Foundation: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesGALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $772,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $675,000 · Human Services+16 more: $5,415,390 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,313,577 · HealthVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $2,175,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $1,775,000 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $1,737,236 · HealthEL CAMPO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $1,000,000 · HealthBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $800,000 · HealthPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $650,000 · HealthPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $564,840 · HealthRESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC: $500,000 · Health+6 more: $2,138,167 · HealthPease Park Conservancy: $8,281,540 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $360,000 · Recreation & SportsGALVESTON HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $2,921,133 · Arts & CultureBIG THOUGHT: $950,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $847,890 · Arts & CultureDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $800,000 · Arts & CultureBroadway Dallas Inc: $550,000 · Arts & CultureWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $500,000 · Arts & CultureZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $450,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $425,000 · Arts & CultureGALVESTON ARTS CENTER: $330,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $275,000 · Arts & CultureWATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY: $3,100,000 · Community ImprovementGALVESTON CHAMBER PARTNERSHIP INC: $625,000 · Community ImprovementVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT: $450,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS CITY OF GALVESTON COUNTY INC: $426,492 · Community ImprovementNPOWER INC: $350,000 · Community ImprovementGALVESTONS OWN FARMERS MARKET INC: $275,000 · Community Improvement
Other$251,108,317Education$203,386,668Human Services$18,038,890Health$14,653,820Recreation & Sports$8,641,540Arts & Culture$8,049,023Community Improvement$5,226,492

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern Methodist University: $100,000,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $60,035,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetPease Park Conservancy: $8,281,540 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetMOODY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $7,888,666 over 4y, 56% of budgetMOODY GARDENS INC: $7,000,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGalveston College Foundation: $6,500,000 over 2y, 71% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,212,604 over 6y, 24% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,313,577 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN: $3,175,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetWATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY: $3,100,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetGALVESTON HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $2,921,133 over 4y, 16% of budgetOdyssey 2020 Academy Inc: $2,651,488 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetGalveston Urban Ministries: $2,361,000 over 4y, 62% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $2,175,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetLUBBOCK COUNTY EXPO CENTER INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetMY POSSIBILITIES: $2,000,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCONFERENCE ON CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN INC: $1,922,816 over 5y, 52% of budgetCHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB: $1,920,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,850,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $1,815,001 over 6y, 12% of budgetMoody Medical Research Institute: $1,800,000 over 2y, 90% of budgetEncore Park Dallas: $1,800,000 over 2y, 80% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $1,775,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $1,737,236 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,640,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,525,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $1,400,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK: $1,262,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetASCEND DALLAS: $1,200,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,110,858 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $1,075,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $1,027,933 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE: $1,000,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetUvalde CISD Moving Forward Foundation: $1,000,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $950,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $933,300 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $847,890 over 1y, 56% of budgetJUNE SHELTON SCHOOL AND EVALUATION CENTER: $833,360 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $831,740 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $800,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $800,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetGALVESTON COUNTY FOOD BANK: $772,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $769,882 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc: $700,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc: $688,942 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $675,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds Pease Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds MOODY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MOODY GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Galveston College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GALVESTON HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Odyssey 2020 Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Galveston Urban Ministries ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK COUNTY EXPO CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
  • Who funds CONFERENCE ON CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB ↗
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMP-U-DOPT INC ↗
  • Who funds Moody Medical Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds Encore Park Dallas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meadows Foundation IncHillcrest FoundationThe Rees-Jones Founda…W P & Bulah Luse Foun…St David's FoundationUnited Way for Greate…Hoblitzelle FoundationGil and Dody Weaver F…Texas Women's Foundat…United Way of Metropo…Austin Community Foun…The Addy Foundation
Meadows Foundation IncTX136.9× affinity98 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meadows Foundation Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · St David's Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Addy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moody Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moody Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Moody Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Moody Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1021 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moody’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home