Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Michael & Dudley Delbalso Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$547k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$2.1MEnvironment$1.7MEducation$1.3MHuman Services$907kScience & Tech$247kRecreation & Sports$221kCrime & Legal$105kFood & Nutrition$60kInternational$48kOther$1.3M
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $349k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $413k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUILLIARD SCHOOL$546,579
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES$523,124
MARIN ART & GARDEN CENTER$521,934
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$162,456
CHINATI FOUNDATION$102,484
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$95,949
WOODWELL CLIMATE RESEARCH CENTER$51,658
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ANNUAL FUND$30,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$25,000
YALE ALUMNI FUND$25,000
LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL$20,000
PRINT CENTER OF NEW YORK$20,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$20,000
STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY$15,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%STONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.9M · 59 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

59 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
10

Total granted

$7.9M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+44%

Still filing today

56%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +58%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    6× · 2018–2025 · $933k · revenue +119%
  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $898k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • CI
    CERES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +66%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
5
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
6
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
7
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
8
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection and the most unlike its peers is Shoreline Greenway Trail Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%53%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%27%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%43%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,719

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
32/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $1,299,597 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTJUDD FOUNDATION — $177,500 · Arts & CultureJUDD FOUNDATIONSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $175,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODER…Museum of Modern Art — $126,500 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtTHE CHINATI FOUNDATION — $119,684 · Arts & CultureTHE CHINATI FOUNDATIONSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $72,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $114,020 · Arts & Culture+6 moreTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $932,543 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAN…Marin Art and Garden Center — $661,934 · EnvironmentMarin Art and Garden Cen…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $88,000 · Environment+3 more — $41,000 · EnvironmentJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $695,579 · EducationJUILLIARD SCHOOLTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $180,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LA…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALI…SKIDMORE COLLEGE — $90,000 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGEGREENWICH ACADEMY INC — $88,000 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEMY …THE STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY INC — $61,000 · EducationMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $50,000 · Education+4 more — $57,500 · EducationYALE ALUMNI FUND — $200,000 · OtherYALE ALUMNI FUNDMUSEUM OF MODERN ART ANNUAL FUND — $161,500 · OtherMUSEUM OF MODERN ART …HEART (HUMANE EDUCATION ADVOCATES) — $110,000 · OtherHEART (HUMANE EDUCATI…PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $88,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODINTERNATIONAL PRINT CENTER NY — $62,000 · OtherBERKELEY ART MUSEUM — $60,000 · OtherWHITNEY MUSEUM OF ART — $60,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF MODERN ART - CAC — $57,500 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $105,000 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAF…GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $60,000 · Other+27 more — $529,650 · Other+27 moreSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $897,631 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FO…+1 more — $9,000 · Human ServicesWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $246,964 · Science & TechCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $220,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$2,084,301Environment$1,723,477Education$1,322,079Other$1,493,650Human Services$906,631Science & Tech$246,964Recreation & Sports$221,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $1,299,597 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $932,543 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $897,631 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $695,579 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMarin Art and Garden Center — $661,934 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc — $246,964 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $220,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $180,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJUDD FOUNDATION — $177,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $175,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $126,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHINATI FOUNDATION — $119,684 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $105,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC — $88,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $88,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $72,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY INC — $61,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art — $59,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $50,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $47,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC — $32,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTONINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $22,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection — $10,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCERES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRANSON SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetStonington Village Improvement Assoc Inc — $8,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe Laundromat Project Inc — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTONINGTON LAND TRUST INC — $6,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetNEW AMSTERDAM SINGERS INC — $5,520 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetONEGOAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHORELINE GREENWAY TRAIL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetReed Schools Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds Marin Art and Garden Center
  • Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds JUDD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art
  • Who funds THE CHINATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE STONINGTON FREE LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
  • Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art
  • Who funds MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds SADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tua Benson P Blake Char TrustTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tua Benson P Blake Char Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Castle Family Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Michael & Dudley Delbalso Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Shoreline Greenway Trail Inc64% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc11% of income from government
  • The Stonington Free Library Inc2% of income from government
  • Stonington Village Improvement Assoc Inc2% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Michael & Dudley Delbalso Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Michael & Dudley Delbalso Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph