Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The McKenna Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$134kEducation$99kReligion$55kHuman Services$6kInternational$5kRecreation & Sports$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$323k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHORE MEDICAL HEALTH FUND$20,000
LASALLE UNIVERSITY$5,000
NAVIVITY PREP SCHOOL OF WILMINGTON$5,000
FRACTURED ATLAS - THE CO-CONSPIRATI$4,000
OBLATE DEVELOPMENT FUND$1,000
SOUTH JERSEY CATHOLIC MINISTRIES$550
SISTERS OF THE HOLY FAMILY NAZARETH$425
NORTHEAST CATHOLIC ALUMNI MEM SCHOL$60
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARY'S SHELTER: $25 → 11%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC: $300 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC: $300 → 14%DELAWARE VALLEY FAIRNESS PROJECT: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
PA
NJ
CO
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$258k · 26 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
29

Total granted

$258k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+38%

Still filing today

15%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LA SALLE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue -40%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON HOSPITAL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k
  • SM
    SHORE MEDICAL HEALTH FUND
    3× · 2023–2025 · $24k

Funded once

  • CF
    CCHM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • DV
    Delaware Valley Fairness Project
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Pennsylvania Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Health System

Provision of charitable healthcare services

Health
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
5
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

6
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
11
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
12
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of South Jersey Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ocean City Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Child and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFood Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr17%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr15%4%35–55yr17%72%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,136

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THOMAS JEFFERSON HOSPITAL — $60,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON HOSPITALCCHM FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherCCHM FOUNDATIONSHORE MEDICAL HEALTH FUND — $24,190 · OtherSHORE MEDICAL HEALTH FUNDST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH — $19,759 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHOBLATES OF ST FRANCIS DE SALES — $13,770 · OtherOBLATES OF ST FRANCIS DE SALESST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL — $8,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH — $8,460 · Other+39 more — $50,515 · Other+39 moreLA SALLE UNIVERSITY — $68,400 · EducationLA SALLE UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…+2 more — $700 · EducationSHORE MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $22,900 · PhilanthropyDelaware Valley Fairness Project — $2,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC — $600 · Human Services+1 more — $25 · Human ServicesHands Together Inc — $2,500 · InternationalJOHN R ELLIOTT FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Crime & LegalOPERATION 300 INC — $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$210,194Education$74,100Philanthropy$22,900Human Services$2,625International$2,500Crime & Legal$1,000Youth Development$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLA SALLE UNIVERSITY — $68,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHands Together Inc — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDelaware Valley Fairness Project — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOHN R ELLIOTT FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOCEAN CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION 300 INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS GLOBAL EDUCATION PROJECT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF OCEAN CITY INC — $415 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA ON MAIN STREET — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Friends of Jean Webster Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBRH Endowment Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN GOLFERS GIVE BACK — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY UNIVERSITY — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA SALLE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc
  • Who funds Delaware Valley Fairness Project
  • Who funds JOHN R ELLIOTT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OCEAN CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds OPERATION 300 INC
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds BLOSSOM PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds WOMENS GLOBAL EDUCATION PROJECT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connelly FoundationPA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The McKenna Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McKenna Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McKenna Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph