Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Martyn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$365kEducation$340kHealth$160kHuman Services$155kAnimals$132kInternational$50kYouth Development$30kEnvironment$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$766k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY THEATRE$200,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
UT
NE
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$910k · 9 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$910k
$372k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-3%

Still filing today

78%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEGACY THEATRE INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $365k · revenue +69%
  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $55k · revenue +45%
  • THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +39%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
8
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
11
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
12
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Community Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%53%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Brothers Academy Incorporated — $180,000 · OtherBrothers Academy IncorporatedGAITHERSBURG HIGH SCHOOL — $135,000 · OtherGAITHERSBURG HIGH SCHOOLTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER — $100,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTE…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $30,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $20,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY — $20,000 · OtherSave the Whales — $20,000 · OtherBIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $35,000 · Other+4 moreTHE LEGACY THEATRE INC — $365,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LEGACY THEATRE INCGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 · AnimalsTIGER HAVEN INC — $15,000 · AnimalsVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $10,000 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife — $10,000 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc — $5,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,000 · Animals+2 more — $2,000 · AnimalsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $50,000 · HealthMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $10,000 · HealthWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $55,000 · Education
Other$560,000Arts & Culture$365,000Philanthropy$100,000Animals$92,000Human Services$65,000Health$60,000Education$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE LEGACY THEATRE INC — $365,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetBrothers Academy Incorporated — $180,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSave the Whales — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBIMINI BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Welfare League — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Martyn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Legacy Theatre Inc1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Martyn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Martyn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph