How much does The Mancheski Foundation Inc give?

The Mancheski Foundation Inc reported 23 grants totaling $806,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 24 and 30 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does The Mancheski Foundation Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (48%), Education (29%), Environment (8%).

Who are The Mancheski Foundation Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Patient Airlift Services Inc ($700k), Yale New Haven Hospital ($662k), Lee Memorial Health System ($600k).

Does The Mancheski Foundation Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Mancheski Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Mancheski Foundation Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.

Where is The Mancheski Foundation Inc based?

The Mancheski Foundation Inc is based in NY.

The Mancheski Foundation Inc

The Mancheski Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Mancheski Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$806k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$100k

Largest

01What it funds

0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.3MEducation$2.0MEnvironment$560kRecreation & Sports$370kInternational$220kCommunity Improvement$150kFood & Nutrition$105kArts & Culture$70kOther$0

02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $30k
$10k–50k11 grants · $205k
$50k–250k6 grants · $571k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$22M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FDN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING	$100,000
LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM	$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION-THE FREDERICK J MANCHESKI SCHOLARSHIP	$100,000
PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC	$100,000
YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL	$96,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION WAISMAN CENTER	$75,000
METROPOLITAN GOLF ASSOCIATION FDN	$45,000
MAKE-A-WISH FDN OF AMERICA	$45,000
THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY	$25,000
FEEDING AMERICA	$20,000
MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION	$10,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION	$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDER	$10,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL	$10,000
RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC	$10,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$6.3M · 32 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.3M

$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

Still filing today

72%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PA
PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC
7× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +113%
YN
YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL
7× · 2017–2024 · $662k · revenue +75%
UO
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
2× · 2017–2019 · $505k · revenue +39%

Funded once

LM
LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC
one grant, 2017 · $100k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND(COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING)
one grant, 2023 · $100k
QU
QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2017 · $75k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech

Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment

American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment

Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment

New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education

National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Hoe Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

20/27

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$3,335,000Human Services$1,315,000Health$827,000Education$505,000Arts & Culture$360,000Environment$350,000Community Improvement$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mancheski Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mancheski Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Mancheski’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home