Loading…
· Public charity
THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR
Los angeles county alliance for boys & girls clubs (the alliance) is a unified and collaborative force representing all 27 clubs with the purpose of securing resources, marketing, and financial support to further the efforts of individual clubs and increase the impact and reach in their communities.
$1.2M
Granted FY2022
20
Grants
1
Communities
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2022 · 20 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k19 grants · $146k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$7,788
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER$1,007,781
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK$8,310
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOOTHILLS$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE WEST VALLEY$7,788
- ANTELOPE VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LA HARBOR$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LONG BEACH$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU$7,788
- WEST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA$7,788
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD$7,788
- LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$7,787
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else
20 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
20
3
Total granted
$2.5M
$38k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+57%
+82%
Still filing today
45%
67%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER5× · 2018–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +243%
- AVANTELOPE VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB5× · 2018–2022 · $86k · revenue +75%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON5× · 2018–2022 · $79k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SOUTH BAYone grant, 2018 · $24k
- SBSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +14%
- ELEAST LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Boys Girls Club
—
2
Boys and Girls Clubs
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
Unclassified
3
Boys and Girls Club
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of Sonoma Valley
To provide positive opportunities for youth to learn and succeed
Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County
Enable young people especially from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential.
Recreation & Sports
6
Boys & Girls Club
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
—
7
Boys & Girls Club of San Marcos
To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as responsible and caring citizens.
—
8
Boys & Girls Club of Vergennes Inc
To inspire and enable all young people to reach their full potential as caring, productive and responsible citizens.
Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Clubs
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, caring and responsible community members.
Youth Development
10
Boys & Girls Clubs
To enable youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
Youth Development
11
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc
To enable youth to realize and develop their full potential as citizens in a global society.
—
12
Boys and Girls Club of Victoria in
To provide diversified program activities to boys and girls in the areas of character and leadership development, education and career development, health and life skills,the arts, and sports, fitness and recreation to inspire and enable…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc and the most unlike its peers is Salesian Boys and Girls Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,036,354Youth Development$550,915
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER ↗
- Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE FOOTHILLS ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds EAST LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Good360 · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Great Public Schools Now · The Play Equity Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 956151763 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Los Angeles County Alliance For?
Find your warmest path to The Los Angeles County Alliance For through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines