· Private foundation
The Lindemann Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRATEFUL FILM FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BENNINGTON COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT INC | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| BUCKLEY SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION | $2,500 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT INC | $2,500 |
| CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| STELLA ADLER STUDIO OF ACTING | $1,000 |
| EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE INC | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA INC | $500 |
| WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC | $500 |
| ALL SEATED IN A BARN | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue ×19- BCBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +47%
- HSHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- MFMINT FILM MTone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS ACTION CENTERone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -27%
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund and the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
- Who funds TOOLS FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds STAR SPORTS THEATRE ARTS & RECREATION INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES OPERA COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE GRATEFUL FILM FUND ↗
- Who funds MINT FILM MT ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BUCKLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds TM23 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MANZANITA SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Los Angeles Foundation ↗
- Who funds Center for Environmental Health ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ARTS AND COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Oceanic Preservation Society ↗
- Who funds Friends For Pets Foundation ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN MILLENNIUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EARTHWAYS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Liberty Hill Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Rosenthal Family Foundation · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Sempra Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lindemann Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.