California · Nonprofit
CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION
CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $32,870 to it, the largest being COMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 13,243 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,243 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- St Marys Methodist Church Foundation Ishared funders
- USA Equestrian Trust Incportfolio match
- The Scott and Tara Roseman Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
2% of CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (39% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $15k → $1k.
2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 100% · 2021 54% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
61% of CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $13k that is directly attributable, 51% of it comes from funders outside California, across 2 states.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- St Marys Methodist Church Foundation Ishared fundersGA · backs 27 organizations that share your funders
- USA Equestrian Trust Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Scott and Tara Roseman Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Quarter Horse Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Beverly J Gepfer and Kirk R Martens Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Oak Tree Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Thoroughbred Charities of America Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Virginia Equine Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United States Equestrian Federation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- California Retirement Management Accountportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Harvey L & Maud C Sorensen Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cow Camp Caridadesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
73% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION?
- CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $32,870 to it, the largest being COMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $32,870 in grants to CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION?
- COMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL HORSEMENS FOUNDATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing