Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of Nm, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $48k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
12
’18
12
’19
13
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$409kHealth$61kHousing & Shelter$36kCivil Rights$20kFood & Nutrition$15kCommunity Improvement$11kEducation$11kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$5,000
Casa Q$5,000
United Way of Bergen County$5,000
Hillel Foundation at UC Santa BarbarA$2,500
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH$2,500
Jewish Community Foundation of New Mexico$2,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$2,500
Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains$2,500
Jewish Federation of Northern NJ$2,500
ANTIDEFAMATION LEAGUE$2,500
ACLU FOUNDATION$2,500
Childrens Health Council$2,500
Womens Economic Ventures$2,500
FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$2,500
LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Childrens Health Council: $3k → 8%SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%THE LEO BAECK INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%Jewish Community Foundation of New Mexico: $391k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $3k → 18%Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains: $4k → 12%JCC Thurnauer School of Music: $3k → 7%Childrens Health Council: $3k → 8%DIRECT RELIEF: $3k → 14%LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%Jewish Community Foundation of New Mexico: $4k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $3k → 18%Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains: $3k → 12%United Way of Bergen County: $6k → 7%Childrens Health Council: $3k → 8%Hillel Foundation at UC Santa BarbarA: $3k → 14%LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%Road Runner Food Bank of NM: $3k → 14%Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains: $3k → 12%United Way of Bergen County: $5k → 7%Childrens Health Council: $3k → 8%Hillel Foundation at UC Santa BarbarA: $3k → 14%LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%Jewish Community Foundation of New Mexico: $3k → 14%Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains: $3k → 12%United Way of Bergen County: $5k → 7%Hillel Foundation at UC Santa BarbarA: $3k → 14%LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%Jewish Community Foundation of New Mexico: $3k → 14%United Way of Bergen County: $5k → 7%Hillel Foundation at UC Santa BarbarA: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $3k → 17%Jewish Federation of Northern NJ: $5k → 7%FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $4k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $3k → 17%Jewish Federation of Northern NJ: $3k → 7%FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $3k → 17%Jewish Federation of Northern NJ: $3k → 7%FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $3k → 17%Jewish Family and Child Service NNJ: $5k → 7%Womens Economic Ventures: $4k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE NNJ: $3k → 7%Womens Economic Ventures: $3k → 14%ACLU FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%Womens Economic Ventures: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 16 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$162k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+94%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthEducationCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +52%
  • CQ
    CASA Q INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $16k · revenue +196%
  • WE
    WOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEFgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +94%
  • JT
    JCC Thurnauer School of Music
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • PS
    PEABODY SCHOOL SANTA BARBARA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Aids Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NM: $399,353 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NM+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $20,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF BERGEN …ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $20,000 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARC…Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains: $11,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of…Hillel Foundation at UC Santa BarbarA: $10,000 · OtherHillel Foundation at …LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherLUPUS RESEARCH INSTIT…Jewish Family and Child Service NNJ: $7,500 · OtherJewish Family and Chi…LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL BELMONT: $4,500 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 · Other+8 more: $17,000 · Other+8 moreTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · HealthCASA Q INC: $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,500 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES: $11,000 · Public BenefitFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $8,500 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$409,353Other$110,500Health$20,000Youth Development$15,500Civil Rights$15,000Public Benefit$11,000Food & Nutrition$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NM: $399,353 over 4y, 39% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCASA Q INC: $15,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MIDDLE SCHOOL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA Q INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LEO BAECK INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leo and Eva Gans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph