Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
15
Organizations funded FY2019
7%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Foundation Of Nm, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 13 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $48k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
12
’18
12
’19
13
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2019
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 16
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
6
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 7% of the organizations The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Civil RightsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201915$43k7%
FY201816$47k44%
FY201712$34kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$409kHealth$61kHousing & Shelter$36kCivil Rights$20kFood & Nutrition$15kCommunity Improvement$11kEducation$11kReligion$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United Way of Bergen County$20,50040%
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc$20,00040%
Casa Q Inc$15,50042%
Women's Economic Ventures$11,00040%
Lupus Research Institute$10,0004n/a
The Foundation for AIDS Research$10,00040%
Children's Health Council Inc$10,00040%
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc$8,50030%
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc$7,50030%
Anti-Defamation League$7,50030%
Leo Baeck Institute Inc$5,00010%
Southern Poverty Law Center Inc$5,00020%
Santa Barbara Middle School$3,00020%
Direct Relief$2,50010%
San Francisco Food Bank$2,50010%
Hillsborough Schools Foundation$1,50010%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($41k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Bergen County: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Cancer Research Fund Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCasa Q Inc: $15,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWomen's Economic Ventures: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Foundation for AIDS Research: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Health Council Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLeo Baeck Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Poverty Law Center Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Middle School: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDirect Relief: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Food Bank: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHillsborough Schools Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc

How much does The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc give?
The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc reported 17 grants totaling $48,000 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (69%), Health (10%), Housing & Shelter (6%).
Who are The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: United Way of Bergen County ($21k), Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc ($20k), Casa Q Inc ($16k).
Does The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc based?
The Leo and Eva Gans Foundation Inc is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leo and Eva Gans’ filings →

More from the funding graph