· Public charity
The Lenny Zakim Fund
THE LENNY ZAKIM FUND ("the fund") believes positive social change can be created by small, effective, grassroots organizations that are often overlooked by large foundations, government agencies, and major donors.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 55 grants below total $620,171 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $646,572 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,401 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k48 grants · $567k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CODESQUAD | $20,000 |
| WE ARE BETTER TOGETHER - THE WARREN DANIEL HAIRSTON PROJECT | $17,500 |
| THE UPWARD PROJECT | $15,000 |
| SOMALI PARENTS ADVOCACY CTR FOR EDUCATION | $15,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD COUNSELING & COMMUNITY SVCS | $15,000 |
| MY BROTHER'S KEEPER 617 | $15,000 |
| RIGHT TO THE CITY OF BOSTON | $15,000 |
| AFRICAN CULTURAL SERVICES | $15,000 |
| CULTURAL EXCHANGE THROUGH SOCCER | $13,892 |
| SOUTH COAST LGBTQ NETWORK | $13,845 |
| TOP NOTCH SCHOLARS | $13,300 |
| PINNACLE PARTNERSHIPS | $13,134 |
| NEIGHBORS UNITED FOR A BETTER EAST BOSTON | $12,500 |
| LOVE LIFE NOW FOUNDATION INC | $12,500 |
| CITY STRINGS UNITED | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC7× · 2017–2023 · $160k · revenue +44%
CHICA INC5× · 2019–2024 · $116k · revenue +299%
CENTRO COMUNITARIO DE TRABAJADORES INCORPORATED5× · 2018–2023 · $100k · revenue +316%
Funded once
- FUFATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue ×14
CENTRO PRESENTE INCone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -32%- PAPOLITICAL ASYLUMIMMIGRATION REPRESENTATION PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +223%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Urban Impact is dedicated to prioritizing the reduction of the impact of poverty for families in the Commonwealth. The organization offers a plethora of small business corporate and community opportunities. These opportunities include…
charitable, educational, and social welfare services.
Digital Ready activates the creative potential of young adults, especially low-income residents, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in Boston's innovation economy.
Start Change serves the nonprofit community and nonprofit project through consulting and shared services. Our mission is to expand capacity within the sector by providing low cost services to clients, consulting contract jobs to…
We exist to empower marginalized, low-income, and underserved communities through transformative experiences that inspire economic growth, educational excellence, and community engagement.
Boston cares organizes and leads team-oriented volunteer opportunities and services in and around boston that have a positive impact on individuals and communities.
preparing youth of today
The Boston Higher Education Resource Center equips first generation youth to obtain a higher education, break the cycle of poverty, and become agents of change in their communities.
Social services and cultural awareness
To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.
To connect, inform and engage christians to drastically impact unacceptable realities in boston. we do this by listening, innovating, and building what god is already doing
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families for Justice As Healing Inc and the most unlike its peers is 2GETHER We Eat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
147 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 147 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CHICA INC ↗
- Who funds BMA TENPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO COMUNITARIO DE TRABAJADORES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES THROUGH MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CULTURAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE WELCOME PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AARONS PRESENTS INC ↗
- Who funds SAHELI INC ↗
- Who funds BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds WE ARE BETTER TOGETHER WARREN DANIEL HAIRSTON PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BAGLY INC ↗
- Who funds SIBLING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PARTAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds LYSOA INC ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN TECH INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FOR JUSTICE AS HEALING INC ↗
- Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds The City School Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM OUT LOUD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR PAN AFRICAN CULTURAL EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COAST LGBTQ NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT OLIVES COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CODESQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds HAWTHORNE YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN BRIDGE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TO THE MOON AND BACK ↗
- Who funds BALLETROX INC ↗
- Who funds LYNN WORKER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Pie R Squared Inc ↗
- Who funds LEVEL GROUND MIXED MARTIAL ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds SCIBOSTON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Foley Hoag Foundation · Haymarket People's Fund Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · The Hyams Foundation Inc · Barr Foundation · Children's Hospital Corporation · Boston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lenny Zakim Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Caring Clinic Inc — 99% of income from government
- Triangle Inc — 90% of income from government
- Alliance for Inclusion and Prevention Inc — 73% of income from government
- Worcester Youth Center Inc — 64% of income from government
- Saheli Inc — 61% of income from government
- Partakers Inc — 59% of income from government
- Legendary Legacies Inc — 58% of income from government
- Association of Haitian Women Inc — 51% of income from government
- English at Large Inc — 49% of income from government
- Living Independently for Equality I — 46% of income from government
- Our Deaf Survivors Center — 43% of income from government
- Multicultural Aids Coalition Inc — 41% of income from government
- Bagly Inc — 39% of income from government
- Mount Olives Community Center Inc — 36% of income from government
- Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp — 32% of income from government
- South Coast Lgbtq Network Inc — 29% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- To the Moon and Back — 21% of income from government
- All Dorchester Sports & Leadership Inc — 21% of income from government
- East Boston Community Soup Kitchen Inc — 20% of income from government
- Building Bridges Through Music Inc — 19% of income from government
- Level Ground Mixed Martial Arts Inc — 19% of income from government
- Kids in Tech Inc — 15% of income from government
- Balletrox Inc — 15% of income from government
- Lysoa Inc — 15% of income from government
- Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
- Chica Inc — 12% of income from government
- Sibling Connections Inc — 10% of income from government
- Community Service Care Inc — 10% of income from government
- South Boston En Accion Inc — 10% of income from government
- Food Link Inc — 9% of income from government
- Out Metrowest Inc — 9% of income from government
- African Cultural Services Inc — 9% of income from government
- Communities for Restorative Justice Inc — 8% of income from government
- One Can Help Inc — 8% of income from government
- Bma Tenpoint Inc — 7% of income from government
- City Strings United Inc — 7% of income from government
- Bread of Life Inc — 6% of income from government
- Brazilian Worker Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Spontaneous Celebrations Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Welcome Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- Dream Out Loud Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- History Project Inc — 3% of income from government
- Think Outside the Vox — 2% of income from government
- Chinese Culture Connection Inc — 2% of income from government
- Double Edge Theatre Productions Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Lesbigay Urban Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Cape Ann Art Haven Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brazilian Women's Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- Asian Women for Health Inc — 0% of income from government
- Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
- Justice at Work Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.