Loading…
Loading…
Massachusetts · Nonprofit
CAPE VERDEAN COMMUNITY UNIDO INC (Massachusetts) is funded by 11 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $379,520 in grants to it, the largest being HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ($118,600). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CAPE VERDEAN COMMUNITY UNIDO INC's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,381 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2018
Grant income rose $15k → $35k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
5 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CAPE VERDEAN COMMUNITY UNIDO INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CAPE VERDEAN COMMUNITY UNIDO INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 31% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 54% · 2020 55% · 2021 89% · 2022 63% · 2023 60% · 2024 79% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
20% of CAPE VERDEAN COMMUNITY UNIDO INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 27% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
CAPE VERDEAN COMMUNITY UNIDO INC is locally rooted: 97% of its grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 11 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.1M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2018 (financials across 2018–2018), and the filings of 11funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing