Loading…
· Public charity
HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC
Haymarket people's fund is an anti-racist and multi-cultural foundation that is committed to strengthening the movement for social justice in new england.
$1.0M
Granted FY2024
47
Grants
10
Communities
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
bostonrightslynn
2020
spontaneous celebrationsmainhaitianlabor educationeducation resetsne missonworksengalnd environmenta
2021
women againstagainst massmass incarcerationbetter wayrightwomen'safrican
2022
collectivebostonactioneducationworkerpower
2023
trainingconditionscodebuildcreateworkingdonor advised
2024
focusstudieslow-incomesupportslowracialpersonal
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 47 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k46 grants · $953k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
- WORCESTER YOUTH COOPERATIVES$31,000
- ALLIANCE TO MOBILIZE OUR RESISTANCE$31,000
- AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE WABANAKI PROGRAM$26,000
- RIGHT TO CITY BOSTON$26,000
- MASSACHUSETTS COALITION OF DOMESTIC WORKERS$26,000
- BROCKTON WORKERS ALLIANCE$26,000
- MUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE$26,000
- LYNN WORKERS CENTER$26,000
- SPRINGFIELD NO ONE LEAVES$26,000
- SISTA FIRE$26,000
- EDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION OF VERMONT$26,000
- YOUTH JUSTICE AND POWER UNION$26,000
- BOSTON EDUCATION JUSTICE ALLIANCE$26,000
- REVERE YOUTH IN ACTION$25,000
- RADICAL ADVOCATES FOR CROSS-CULTURAL EDUCATION (RACCE)$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $588k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 98 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else
98 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
98
149
Total granted
$4.2M
$1.4M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+85%
+99%
Still filing today
53%
23%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $241k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRESIST4× · 2020–2024 · $190k · revenue +1062%
- LWLYNN WORKERS CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $117k · revenue +409% · 47% of their budget
SPRINGFIELD NO ONE LEAVES3× · 2021–2024 · $116k · revenue +501%
Funded once
- RYREVERE YOUTH IN ACTIONone grant, 2022 · $22k
- IHI HAVE A FUTUREone grant, 2022 · $22k
- RTRIGHT TO THE CITY BOSTONone grant, 2022 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Green Worker Inc
The organization is based in the south bronx and serves immigrants and communities of color by building, growing, and sustaining worker-owned green businesses to create a strong, local, and democratic economy rooted in racial and gender…
Environment
2
Workers Center for Racial Just
The mission of the Workers Center For Racial Justice is to eliminate structural barriers to sustainable and living wage
Civil Rights
3
Rootsuprising Incorporated
RootsUprising is dedicated to raising and lifting up the untold stories of marginalized groups of people especially the BIPOC communities through the language of dance as a means for transformation. RootsUprising is grounded in the belief…
Arts & Culture
4
Brooklyn Emerge Inc
Working towards a just and fair brooklyn through oragnizing and mobalizing the immigrant communities at the grass root level
Human Services
5
Start Change Inc
Start Change serves the nonprofit community and nonprofit project through consulting and shared services. Our mission is to expand capacity within the sector by providing low cost services to clients, consulting contract jobs to…
Community Improvement
6
Womens March Inc
Harness the political power of diverse women and their communities to create transformative social change
—
7
Boston Women's Fund Inc
To support community-based organizations & grassroots initiatives run by women and girls in order to create a society based on racial, economic and social justice. we strive for a world free of racism, poverty, and sexism.
Philanthropy
8
Climate Jobs Massachusetts Inc
The objective of the fund is to help build a worker-oriented environmental movement committed to securing a fair and just transition that protects not only the environment but also the livelihoods of workers and their communities.
Environment
9
Maine Association for New Americans
MANA is an immigrant-led organization that promotes social & personal empowerment of immigrants in Maine through raising awareness of individual and collective trauma and how they affect our lives, expanding people's resilience building…
Community Improvement
10
Colectivo Ile Corporacion
Educate and research anti-racist and decolonizing work inside and outside of Puerto Rico
Human Services
11
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc
Environmental Justice & Equality
Education
12
New England Farm Workers Council Inc
Human welfare organization
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families for Justice As Healing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Forestille Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
2%3/122
the rest of the field
10%
4,106/42,236
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
111 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
99/111
Grantees still filing
84/111
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$3,724,667Human Services$831,600Community Improvement$410,250Civil Rights$323,750Arts & Culture$272,050Education$151,400Youth Development$137,750
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RESIST ↗
- Who funds LYNN WORKERS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD NO ONE LEAVES ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON WORKERS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH JUSTICE AND POWER UNION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE TO MOBILIZE OUR RESISTANCE ↗
- Who funds SISTERS UNCHAINED ↗
- Who funds MAINE COMMUNITY INTERGRATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRO COMUNITARIO DE TRABAJADORES (CCT) ↗
- Who funds SISTA FIRE ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER YOUTH COOPERATIVES ↗
- Who funds THE FANG COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds STUDIO POTTER ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds RESTORATIVE PRACTICES ADVISORY AND ACTION GROUP ↗
- Who funds CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds BAMS FEST INC ↗
- Who funds STEP UP NEW LONDON ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds OLNEYVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds COYOTE RI ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION OF VT ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER ROOTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NATIVE GREEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Lenny Zakim FundMA51× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Lenny Zakim Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · The Hyams Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Center for Economic Democracy Inc · New England Grassroots Environment Fund · Eastern Bank Foundation · Resist Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Third Sector New England Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Greater Malden Asian American Community — 100% of income from government
- Community Caring Clinic Inc — 99% of income from government
- Connecticut Worker Center Inc — 67% of income from government
- Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc — 53% of income from government
- Association of Haitian Women Inc — 51% of income from government
- Root Social Justice Center Inc — 42% of income from government
- Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp — 32% of income from government
- Retreat Farm Ltd — 25% of income from government
- Community Resilience Organizations — 25% of income from government
- Justice for Housing Inc — 22% of income from government
- Worcester Roots Project — 12% of income from government
- Afro Caribbean Cultural Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- African Cultural Services Inc — 9% of income from government
- Commonwealth Kitchen Inc — 9% of income from government
- Clemmons Family Farm Inc — 9% of income from government
- Brazilian Worker Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Spontaneous Celebrations Inc — 5% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Transformative Culture Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Worcester Common Ground Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brazilian Women's Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- Bams Fest Inc — 0% of income from government
- Asian American Resource Workshop Inc — 0% of income from government
- Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
28get no government money at all
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NATIVE GREEN.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
high risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up +77% since.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 851342718 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NATIVE GREEN, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Haymarket People's Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Haymarket People's Fund Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines