Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Legacy Institute

To advance public education and community development in colorado springs.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Recreation & Sports$3.4MHuman Services$860kEducation$423kCommunity Improvement$205kArts & Culture$126kYouth Development$94kFood & Nutrition$64kEnvironment$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $77,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $82,418 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,918 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$458k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOINT INITIATIVES YOUTH AND FAMILIE$35,000
PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
ATLAS PREPARATORY SCHOOL$10,000
PARENTS CHALLENGE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Early Milestones Colorado: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 6 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$4.8M
$314k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
-3%

Still filing today

83%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UB
    USA Basketball
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3.4M · revenue +242%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL COLORADO INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $810k
  • AP
    Atlas Preparatory School Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • PP
    Pikes Peak Partnership
    one grant, 2018 · $185k
  • SE
    STRIDER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $59k · revenue -9%
  • EM
    EARLY MILESTONES COLORADO
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
3
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
4
Partners in Child Development Inc

To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…

Human Services
5
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
6
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
7
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
8
Pikes Peak Community Foundation

To inspire a passionate community to forge an enduring legacy now and for future generations. this mission is attained by building a community endowment, helping donors address community needs and providing philanthropic leadership.

Philanthropy
9
Arapahoe County Early Childhood Council Inc

Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.

Education
10
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
11
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

12
Prairie Crossing Charter School

We believe that children are our best hope to improve the world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parents Challenge and the most unlike its peers is Concrete Couch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

USA Basketball — $3,367,184 · Recreation & SportsUSA BasketballCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL COLORADO INC — $810,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF …Pikes Peak Partnership — $185,000 · OtherPikes Peak PartnershipJOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES — $35,000 · OtherAtlas Preparatory School Inc — $240,000 · EducationAtlas Prepa…PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 · EducationPIKES PEAK …Hey Neighbor — $84,000 · EducationHey Neighbo…+2 more — $17,500 · EducationCONCRETE COUCH — $126,000 · Arts & CultureSTRIDER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $59,000 · Youth DevelopmentEARLY MILESTONES COLORADO — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE DELTA INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Recreation & Sports$3,367,184Other$1,030,000Education$506,500Arts & Culture$126,000Youth Development$59,000Human Services$50,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUSA Basketball — $3,367,184 over 3y, 23% of budgetAtlas Preparatory School Inc — $240,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetCONCRETE COUCH — $126,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetHey Neighbor — $84,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetSTRIDER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $59,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEARLY MILESTONES COLORADO — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetJOINT INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES — $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Child Development — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DELTA INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pikes Peak Community FoundationCO19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · Daniels Fund · Mile High United Way Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Legacy Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Legacy Institute?

    Find your warmest path to The Legacy Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph