Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Welk Family Philanthropies Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Housing & Shelter$464kHuman Services$349kYouth Development$206kArts & Culture$125kPhilanthropy$87kHealth$37kEducation$20kInternational$16kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGELICA CENTER FOR ARTS & MUSIC$35,000
ONE VOICE$35,000
SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH$35,000
IMAGINE LA$30,000
A STEP BEYOND$30,000
GOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER$25,000
HARVEST HOME$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $604k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVEST HOME: $20k → 14%Imagine LA: $30k → 14%Imagine LA: $30k → 14%North County Solutions for Change: $15k → 11%IMAGINE LA: $30k → 14%Imagine LA: $25k → 14%Imagine LA: $25k → 14%IMAGINE LA: $20k → 14%ONE VOICE: $35k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $60k → 14%One Voice: $30k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $35k → 14%One Voice: $30k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $30k → 14%One Voice: $25k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $28k → 14%One Voice: $25k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $28k → 14%ONE VOICE: $25k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $28k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $20k → 14%Help Guide: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$1.1M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+0%

Still filing today

89%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEmploymentEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $229k · revenue +173%
  • AS
    A Step Beyond
    7× · 2017–2023 · $206k · revenue +92%
  • OV
    One Voice
    7× · 2017–2023 · $170k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LL
    LIFT LA
    one grant, 2018 · $28k
  • GS
    Good Shepard Shelter
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • LP
    LA Partnership for Early Childhood
    2× · 2017–2019 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

3
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
4
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
5
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
6
Family Promise of Los Angeles

Family promise of the south bay assists families experiencing housing insecurity with short-term shelter, case management, and navigation with the goal of creating a sustainable solution for their family.

Human Services
7
Farm2People

Farm2People's mission is to secure local harvests and fight hunger in Greater Los Angeles.

Food & Nutrition
8
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
9
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
10
Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter
11
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

12
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Angelica Center for Arts and Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr10%36%35–55yr12%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%30%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr12%0%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
15%
10,651/69,669

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $229,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INCOne Voice — $170,000 · Human ServicesOne VoiceImagine Los Angeles Inc — $160,000 · Human ServicesImagine Los Angeles Inc+3 more — $45,000 · Human Services+3 moreA Step Beyond — $206,000 · Arts & CultureA Step BeyondAngelica Center for Arts and Music — $115,000 · Arts & CultureAngelica Center for Arts an…1IN6 INC — $65,000 · Other1IN6 INCLIFT LA — $28,000 · OtherLIFT LAGOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER — $25,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD SH…Good Shepard Shelter — $20,000 · OtherGood Shepard She…LA Partnership for Early Childhood — $20,000 · OtherLA Partnership f…USC Center on Philanthropy — $10,000 · OtherUSC Center on Ph…+4 more — $19,000 · Other+4 moreNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $42,500 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $28,000 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $21,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,200 · PhilanthropyLIFT INC — $88,000 · EmploymentHarmony Project — $10,000 · EducationSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$604,000Arts & Culture$321,000Other$187,000Philanthropy$102,700Employment$88,000Education$10,000Crime & Legal$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $229,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetA Step Beyond — $206,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetOne Voice — $170,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc — $160,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetAngelica Center for Arts and Music — $115,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetLIFT INC — $88,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budget1IN6 INC — $65,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $42,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHarvest Home Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHarmony Project — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPGUIDEORG INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBROTHER BENNO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $4,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Welk Family Philanthropies Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Welk Family Philanthropies Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Welk Family Philanthropies Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph