Skip to content
The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$567kHuman Services$262kHealth$230kInternational$115kPublic Benefit$106kPhilanthropy$100kEmployment$88kYouth Development$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $161k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS$25,000
TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS$17,750
TEAM RED WHITE AND BLUE$17,750
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$17,750
TEAM RUBICON INC$17,750
UCSF FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPEMENT$10,000
MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL$5,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF$5,000
PETER'S PLACE$5,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC$5,000
KERN PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $18k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $15k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $12k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $11k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%DELIVER FUND: $3k → 14%DELIVER FUND: $3k → 14%DELIVER FUND: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
PA
CA
VA
AZ
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 25 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
6

Total granted

$1.4M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+24%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Dallas
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +36%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +90%
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • WA
    WESTLAKE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SC
    SUPPORTIVE CHILD-ADULT NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HP
    HAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
4
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
University of Redlands

We welcome, educate, and empower a diverse community of learners for lives of meaning, impact, and joy.

Education
9
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Dallas: $235,000 · EducationUniversity of DallasTexas A&M Foundation: $175,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $65,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLV…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO…SHIPLEY SCHOOL: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationWALL STREET WARFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $88,000 · OtherWALL STREET WARFIGHTERS FOUNDATI…RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPEMENT: $85,000 · OtherRESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPEMENTUNITED WAY OF SE PA: $80,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF SE PACLEVELAND CLINIC: $61,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICPHILADELPHIA HOSPITALITY INC: $20,000 · OtherPETER'S PLACE: $45,000 · OtherPETER'S PLACE+11 more: $81,000 · Other+11 moreTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $105,750 · HealthTRAGEDY ASSISTA…MAYO CLINIC: $67,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL: $45,000 · HealthMARIN GENERAL H…+1 more: $7,000 · HealthTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $105,750 · Public BenefitFAMILY DOG & PUPPY RESCUE: $15,000 · Public BenefitWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105,750 · Human ServicesDeliverFund: $9,000 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC: $105,750 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND: $29,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$548,000Other$460,000Health$224,750Public Benefit$120,750Human Services$114,750Public Safety & Disaster$105,750Philanthropy$49,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Dallas: $235,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $175,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $105,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $105,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $105,750 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWALL STREET WARFIGHTERS FOUNDATION: $88,000 over 8y, 61% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $67,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPETER'S PLACE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND: $29,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA HOSPITALITY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KERN PROJECT: $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILY DOG & PUPPY RESCUE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVERDE VALLEY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBenchmark School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDeliverFund: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA DE AMMA: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET RESCUE CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLUKE'S LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WALL STREET WARFIGHTERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds PETER'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds THE JIM SAUNDERS FUND ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHIPLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE KERN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY DOG & PUPPY RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds VERDE VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Benchmark School ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds DeliverFund ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE AMMA ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PET RESCUE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LUKE'S LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Marin Community Found…Lincoln Financial Fou…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home