Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
18
Grants FY2025
17
Organizations funded FY2024
6%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
16 to 19
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
9
Total assets, FY2025
$3.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 6% of the organizations The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving16$176k6%
FY202417$160k6%
FY202316$161k13%
FY202216$185k0%
FY202117$158k6%
FY202019$163k5%
FY201918$163k22%
FY201816$155k0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$567kHuman Services$262kHealth$230kInternational$115kPublic Benefit$106kPhilanthropy$100kEmployment$88kYouth Development$85kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
PA
CA
VA
AZ
HI
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Dallas$235,00090%
Texas A&M Foundation$175,00090%
Team Rubicon Inc$105,75090%
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc$105,75090%
Wounded Warrior Project Inc$105,75090%
Team Red White & Blue Inc$105,75090%
Wall Street Warfighters Foundation$88,000861%
University of California San Francisco Foundation$50,00090%
Marin General Hospital$45,00090%
Peter's Place$45,00091%
The Jim Saunders Fund$29,00052%
Philadelphia Hospitality Inc$20,00043%
Shipley School$20,00040%
The Kern Project$15,00032%
Family Dog & Puppy Rescue$15,00031%
Verde Valley School$10,00020%
Benchmark School$10,00020%
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey$10,00010%
Westtown School$10,0002n/a
DeliverFund$9,00030%
Casa de Amma$7,00030%
Supportive Child-Adult Network$5,0001n/a
Colel Chabad$4,0002n/a
Hawaii Preparatory Academy$3,00010%
Pet Rescue Center Inc$2,50011%
Luke's Legacy Foundation$2,50012%
Center for Child Protection$2,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($246k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 24 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Dallas: $235,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $175,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTeam Rubicon Inc: $105,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc: $105,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWounded Warrior Project Inc: $105,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTeam Red White & Blue Inc: $105,750 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWall Street Warfighters Foundation: $88,000 over 8y, 61% of budgetUniversity of California San Francisco Foundation: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMarin General Hospital: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPeter's Place: $45,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetThe Jim Saunders Fund: $29,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPhiladelphia Hospitality Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetShipley School: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kern Project: $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFamily Dog & Puppy Rescue: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVerde Valley School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBenchmark School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDeliverFund: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCasa de Amma: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHawaii Preparatory Academy: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPet Rescue Center Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLuke's Legacy Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCenter for Child Protection: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY12.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 with peer funders

About The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007

How much does The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 give?
The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 reported 18 grants totaling $191,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 16 and 19 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (35%), Human Services (16%), Health (14%).
Who are The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: University of Dallas ($235k), Texas A&M Foundation ($175k), Team Rubicon Inc ($106k).
Does The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 6% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Marin Community Foundation, Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc.
Where is The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 based?
The Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007 is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larsen Foundation Xxxxx8007’s filings →

More from the funding graph