· Private foundation
The Justin Gimelstob Children's Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $44k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BABY2BABY | $44,288 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $6,000 |
| CAMP DEL CORAZON | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE INC | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE VALERIE FUND2× · 2018–2023 · $203k · revenue +44%
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angeles2× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +23%
- HHHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- PSPROFESSIONAL SPORTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $26k
- NBNick Bollettieri Foundation Incone grant, 2021 · $10k
- NDNovak Djokovic Foundation USAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +211%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
To advance research and patient care in the field of pediatric cardiology
Chance for life's mission is to raise awareness and funds for critical research and clinical trials for pediatric cancer in the united states of america.
Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…
Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…
The organization's mission is to raise funds to improve the outcome for children with brain tumors by advancing scientific discovery and clinical research that focuses on:* targeted therapy* effective drug delivery* low treatment-related…
CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…
Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.
To raise funds to advance the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of congential heart defects.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Brain Tumor Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nick Bollettieri Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE VALERIE FUND ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR CHILDREN RESEARCH FOUND ↗
- Who funds Nick Bollettieri Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds TEAM LUKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Novak Djokovic Foundation USA ↗
- Who funds CAMP DEL CORAZON INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF SE MORRIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Team Luke Hope for Minds ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds DURGA TREE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Justin Gimelstob Children's Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.