Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph Fidler Walsh & Majorie Walsh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$238kCommunity Improvement$164kEducation$129kHealth$68kArts & Culture$66kPhilanthropy$45kInternational$21kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION$25,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
SIMMS MANN UCLA CENTER$20,000
KCSN 885$7,500
ARRL$5,000
MONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$5,000
GLSEN$5,000
CLEANSLATE LA$2,000
ANGELS AT RISK$1,000
TREE PEOPLE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDANCE: $500 → 9%MONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 16%MONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 16%MONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSCO: $2k → 16%MONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $2k → 16%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$637k · 18 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
33

Total granted

$637k
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+14%

Still filing today

56%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +8%
  • VI
    VETSAID INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $86k · revenue ×27 · 34% of their budget
  • TJ
    THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $32k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • WA
    WALLIS ANNEBERG CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • WC
    WAIOHIKI COMMUNITY CHARTIABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • FA
    FACING ADDICTION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
2
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
3
Physicians for Social Responsibility

Psr-la is a physician and health advocate membership organization working to protect public health from nuclear threats and environmental toxins.

International
4
Silent Spring Institute Inc

Silent spring institute is dedicated to advancing science on the influence of environmental chemicals on women's health, with a focus on breast cancer prevention.

Health
5
The Goldman Sachs Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace

The david lynch foundation for consciousness-based education and world peace (the "foundation or "dlf") is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005. the foundation helps to prevent and eradicate the epidemic of trauma and toxic…

Philanthropy
9
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
10
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
11
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
12
The Soloviev Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Treepeople Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIMMS MANN UCLA CENTER: $110,000 · OtherSIMMS MANN UCLA CENTERKENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYKCSN 885: $50,083 · OtherKCSN 885THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONWALLIS ANNEBERG CENTER: $20,000 · OtherWAIOHIKI COMMUNITY CHARTIABLE TRUST: $20,000 · OtherARRL: $20,000 · Other+33 more: $121,800 · Other+33 moreSANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION: $182,500 · Community ImprovementSANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDAT…VETSAID INC: $85,500 · PhilanthropyVETSAID INCTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ELIZABET…+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyGLSEN INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsYellowhammer Fund: $2,500 · Civil RightsMONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesTHE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureONE WORLD STRONG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$458,883Community Improvement$182,500Philanthropy$92,500Civil Rights$32,500Human Services$17,000Arts & Culture$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION: $182,500 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetVETSAID INC: $85,500 over 3y, 34% of budgetGLSEN INC: $30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $14,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetTHE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE ARCHIVAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGELS AT RISK: $4,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOCEANA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYellowhammer Fund: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLAREMATRIX: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetExtraordinary Families: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLEANSLATE-LA: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FARRAH FAWCETT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VETSAID INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTCLAIR HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WALDEN WOODS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ONE WORLD STRONG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE ARCHIVAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS AT RISK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Yellowhammer Fund ↗
  • Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
  • Who funds Extraordinary Families ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CLEANSLATE-LA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lotus US Foundation IncCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lotus US Foundation Inc · The Fran & Ray Stark Foundation · The David Geffen Foundation · Moss Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph Fidler Walsh & Majorie Walsh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph Fidler Walsh & Majorie Walsh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Walden Woods Project: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joseph Fidler Walsh & Majorie Walsh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Joseph Fidler Walsh & Majorie Walsh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph Fidler Walsh & Majorie Walsh’s filings →

More from the funding graph