· Public charity
Elizabeth Toon Charities
ELIZABETH TOON CHARITIES is a christian based 501(c)3 organization dedicated to serving needy children (and their families) throughout texas.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k16 grants · $570k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| HOPE FARM | $50,000 |
| RISE SCHOOL OF DALLAS | $40,000 |
| TAYLOR'S GIFT | $40,000 |
| DALLAS CASA | $40,000 |
| FAMILY GETAWAY | $40,000 |
| TRAFFICK911 | $40,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES | $40,000 |
| KING'S ACADEMY | $40,000 |
| CAMP JOHN MARC | $40,000 |
| SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL | $40,000 |
| DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY | $40,000 |
| JULIETTE FOWLER COMM CENTER | $40,000 |
| HEROES FOR CHILDREN | $30,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $783k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER4× · 2019–2025 · $218k · revenue +18%
- SCSPECIAL CAMPS FOR SPECIAL KIDS4× · 2019–2025 · $218k · revenue +43%
- TSTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN4× · 2019–2025 · $218k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- DHDALLAS HEARING FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $49k · revenue +38%
- MJMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMCone grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
- PPOETICone grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
To provide individualized services that positively impact the lives of 0-3 year old children with developmental disabilities/delays and their families.
The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.
Head start of greater dallas, inc. provides children with the foundation of skills and knowledge they need to be successful in school and life and fosters self-reliant families and communities.
Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.
The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…
Dallas kids first elevates dialogue on the impact of school board leadership for kids in dallas isd and supports school board elections with focus on outcomes for kids.
The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…
Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…
Morning star academy exists to provide a safe, nurturing environment that allows children to grow physically, spiritually and academically by integrating biblical faith and quality education into all of our childcare and academic programs.
Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.
To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Spida Inc Braswell Child Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CAMPS FOR SPECIAL KIDS ↗
- Who funds RISE SCHOOL OF DALLAS ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Mane Gait ↗
- Who funds BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Traffick911 ↗
- Who funds YOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED ↗
- Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS HEARING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RISE ADVENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
- Who funds POETIC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BEACON HILL PREPARATORY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds LUKE 181 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TAYLOR'S GIFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
- Who funds CATCH UP & READ INC ↗
- Who funds Youth With Faces ↗
- Who funds C5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Carson Leslie Foundation ↗
- Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds RHETT SULLIVAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEROES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
- Who funds TO BE LIKE ME ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
- Who funds EMILY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDCAREGROUP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Capital for Kids · The Moody Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Ninnie L Baird Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Elizabeth Toon Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elizabeth Toon Charities?
Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Toon Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.