· Private foundation
John Mohme Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $118k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+2 grants · $600k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $300,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS | $300,000 |
| CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO | $241,500 |
| INNER CITY YOUTH ORCHESTRA OF LOS ANGELES | $200,000 |
| LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION | $175,000 |
| GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND | $175,000 |
| PLACER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| A PLACE CALLED HOME | $125,000 |
| AL WOOTEN JR YOUTH CENTER | $109,750 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ART DIVISION | $100,000 |
| EDUCATING STUDENTS TOGETHER | $100,000 |
| LATINO LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $100,000 |
| HOMEWARD BOUND GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE AND SANCTUARY | $100,000 |
| BRIDGE BUILDERS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $732k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $515k · revenue +37%
- AWAL WOOTEN JR YOUTH CENTER4× · 2022–2025 · $424k · revenue +6%
- HBHOMEWARD BOUND GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE & SANCTUARY INC4× · 2022–2025 · $375k · revenue +14%
Funded once
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%- FFFieldHaven Feline Centerone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +20%
- DODEL ORO CAREGIVER RESOURCE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.
CalAnimals leads, empowers, and strengthens its members through education, training, advocacy, and networking, while serving as the collective voice for animal care and control agencies, humane
C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.
Help rescue, adopt, and provide medical care for abandoned animals in the coachella valley
We are a community-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization operating a cat-onlyclinic and adoption center. We rescue at-risk cats and kittens, provide them withclinical care and nurturing to address their medical and behavioral needs and…
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
Dcla is devoted to the well-being of dogs and their human companions. we foster a culture of mindful canine stewardship and are committed to shaping the future of sheltering and animal welfare reform.
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Placer Yuba and Sutter and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Heights Tutorial Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INNER CITY YOUTH ORCHRSTRA OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AL WOOTEN JR YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE & SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO FDBA KXPR/KXJZ INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Heights Tutorial Program ↗
- Who funds CUESTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds Art Division ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION PLANET ↗
- Who funds Law Foundation of Silicon Valley ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds EDUCATING STUDENTS TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds California School-Age Consortium Inc ↗
- Who funds Placer Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOLLENBECK PALMS ↗
- Who funds SUPPORTING THE TAYLOR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Latino Leadership Council Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Gold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARMATCH INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING THE FOOTHILLS ↗
- Who funds TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sanctuary of Hope ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SIGHT WORD BUSTERS ↗
- Who funds Itsie Bitsie Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds DACHSHUNDS AND FRIENDS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO GUITAR SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FieldHaven Feline Center ↗
- Who funds DEL ORO CAREGIVER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds KITTEN RESCUE ↗
- Who funds FIRST RESPONDER THERAPY DOGS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Placer Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Petco Love · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John Mohme Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.