· Public charity
Illinois Humanities Council Inc
Fostering a culture in which the humanities are a vital part of the lives of individuals and communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $285,850 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $639,150 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $353,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k20 grants · $137k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $149k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE HUB-ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| CARBONDALE COMMUNITY ARTS INC | $20,000 |
| KNOX COLLEGE | $19,550 |
| SAINT LEONARD'S MINISTRIES | $18,000 |
| RESILIENCE PARTNERS NFP | $14,250 |
| CHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND | $14,000 |
| LEGACY TRAINING INC | $13,250 |
| RESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION | $10,250 |
| LEGACY TRAINING INC | $10,000 |
| PRISON AND NEIGHBORHOOD ARTS EDUCATION PROJECT | $10,000 |
| DARREN B EASTERLING CENTER OF RESTORATIVE PRACTICES | $8,000 |
| FIRSTFOLLOWERS | $8,000 |
| CHICAGO TORTURE JUSTICE MEMORIAL | $8,000 |
| NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| BEYOND THE WALLS THE MOVEMENT NFP | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2023, 23 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FWFREE WRITE ARTS & LITERACY NFP3× · 2018–2020 · $47k · revenue +44%
- RJRESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2023 · $46k · revenue +31%
- CNCONTEXTOS NFP5× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +163%
Funded once
- CACENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTERone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +15%
- FFOREFRONTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +67%
- M1MARCH 13 FUNDone grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Threewalls is dedicated to fostering contemporary art practices that respond to lived experiences, encouraging connections beyond art through performance, live exhibits, publications, all while connected segregated communities throughout…
To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.
To promote the arts and provide an information system for and about the arts.
EQUITY ARTS is a center for the creative economy that advances racial equity and wealth-building for artists and entrepreneurs. This reparative ownership model preserves space for synergistic exchanges between value-aligned partners. The…
Floating Museum is an arts collective that creates new models exploring relationships between art, community, architecture, and public institutions.
Cultivates new and emerging Chicago artists, and aims to benefit artists by exploring art and learning. Through exhibitions, artist residencies, classes/workshops and community building, we are dedicated to cultivating new voices, ideas,…
Cinema/Chicago, the non-profit 501(c)(3) presenting organization of the Chicago International Film Festival, enriches the community through year-round programming devoted to international and independent cinema. We strengthen communication…
Founded in 1912, with a history centered on women artists, 3Arts, Inc. (the Organization) is an Illinois not-for-profit organization that supports artists working in the performing, teaching, and visual arts in the Chicago metropolitan…
The mission of the Black Arts & Culture Alliance of Chicago is to collectively advance Black excellence in the work of the Black arts and culture sector.
Free Street Theater creates afforable, inclusive and innovative theater in communities across Chicago Seeking new and effective ways to challenge racial and economic segregation through the arts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Indian Center and the most unlike its peers is African-American Cultural & Genealogical Society of Il Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
156 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 156 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FREE WRITE ARTS & LITERACY NFP ↗
- Who funds RESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Legacy Training and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds CONTEXTOS NFP ↗
- Who funds THE VOICES & FACES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUB-ARTS AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SYLVIA WOODS JOSEPHINE WYATT AND CLARICE DURHAM ↗
- Who funds Carbondale Community Arts Incorporated ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Chicago Cultural Alliance ↗
- Who funds KNOX COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG CHICAGO AUTHORS ↗
- Who funds BRUSHWOOD CENTER AT RYERSON WOODS ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND ↗
- Who funds FIFTH HOUSE ENSEMBLE ↗
- Who funds STORYCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds Adler University ↗
- Who funds Resilience Partners NFP ↗
- Who funds COLLABORACTION THEATRE CO ↗
- Who funds CHANGING WORLDS ↗
- Who funds The Juvenile Justice Initiative Attn Elizabeth Clarke ↗
- Who funds 826CHI INC ↗
- Who funds SAVANNA HISTORICAL SOCIETY NFP ↗
- Who funds FIRST FOLLOWERS ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTER ↗
- Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗
- Who funds SIXTY INCHES FROM CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC ART GROUP ↗
- Who funds MARCH 13 FUND ↗
- Who funds GICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN-AMERICAN CULTURAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF IL INC ↗
- Who funds Storycatchers ↗
- Who funds Chicago Votes ↗
- Who funds Full Spectrum Features NFP ↗
- Who funds Circles and Ciphers ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Field Foundation of Illinois · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Crossroads Fund Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · Builders Vision Foundation · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Alphawood Foundation · Chicago Foundation for Women
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Illinois Humanities Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.