Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc

Ncrc cdf, a us treasury-certified community development financial institution, provides access to capital for america's underserved communities that supports entrepreneurship and affordable homeownership.

$157M
Granted FY2023
2,666
Grants FY2023
29
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Human Services$48MPhilanthropy$30MPublic Safety & Disaster$26MArts & Culture$24MPublic Benefit$8.2MCommunity Improvement$7.5MFood & Nutrition$6.8MEducation$1.1MOther$0
02FY2023 · 2666 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2,666 grants below total $149,332,697 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $156,669,431 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,336,734 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k22 grants · $182k
  • $10k–50k1406 grants · $31M
  • $50k–250k1147 grants · $85M
  • $250k+91 grants · $34M
$43,552
Median grant
29
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KATO KAGAKU CO LTD DBA HYATT REGENCY CHICAGO$1,769,933
THOR PALMER HOUSE HOTEL LLC DBA THE PALMER HOUSE HILTON BY AND THROUGH HLT$1,429,360
CHICAGO LESSEE LLC$1,344,870
SCH&T CORPORATION OF ILLINOIS$1,060,915
MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES LLC$1,045,236
Q CENTER LLC$907,613
IHG MANAGMENT MARYLAND LLC$689,856
909 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE CORPORATION$653,273
DTRS COLUMBUS DRIVE LLC$598,398
BRESWISS LP$576,622
MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES LLC$531,328
RENAISSANCE HOTEL OPERATING CO$487,777
140 E WALTON BUILDING LLC$466,001
CP IPERS ROSEMONT HOTEL LLC$457,291
CHSP TRS LAKESHORE LLC$452,936
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAURENT HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 15%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $70k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Opera of Chicago
2
Constellation Performing Arts

Constellation is a performing arts presenter with an emphasis on forward- thinking practices, particularly in the areas of jazz, improvised, experimental, and contemporary classical music.

Arts & Culture
3
Cerqua Rivera Dance Theatre

To use multiple artistic forms (primarily dance and music) and the combined talents of our diverse company to convey intense personal narratives. We are proudly and visibly multicultural, exploring the intersection of heritage, culture,…

Arts & Culture
4
Pegasus Theatre Chicago

Pegasus Theatre Chicago is a professional theater approaching 45 years of supporting Chicagos diverse community by producing accessible, socially relevant theatre and promoting the development of new artists for the stage. Our mission is…

5
Arts Illiana Inc

To promote the arts and provide an information system for and about the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Firehouse Community Arts Center of Chicago

Center in chicago for arts community purpose

Arts & Culture
7
Collaborative Arts Institute of Chicago
Arts & Culture
8
South Chicago Dance Theatre

South Chicago Dance Theatre (SCDT) is a multicultural organization seamlessly fusing classical and contemporary dance styles as well as preserving historic dance work. With Choreographic Diplomacy at the heart of the organization, the…

Arts & Culture
9
Chicago Harp Quartet
10
Open Space Arts

Open Space Arts is a Chicago-based nonprofit dedicated to producing bold LGBTQ-focused theater and presenting independent queer cinema. The organization supports emerging and established artists while engaging audiences through live…

Arts & Culture
11
Third Eye Theatre Ensemble

We strive to champion operatic works that are seldom performed, while advocating social change and providing Chicago emerging artists with performance opportunities.

Arts & Culture
12
The Calumet Theatre Company

The Calumet Theatre Company is committed to offering a quality entertainment experience that provides diverse cultural and artistic opportunities while preserving the historic character of the theater.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Comite Cultural Mexicano. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Family Philanthropic Founda…Trade Union LocalsAffordable Housing ProvidersProfessional Trade Associat…Arts Education and AdvocacySocial Justice AdvocacyHospital Systems and Health…Islamic Religious Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Youth and Family Support Se…Classical Music OrchestrasCancer Support and ResearchYouth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr13%8%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr20%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr20%30%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%2/2,639
the rest of the field
14%
7,926/56,664

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

274 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 274 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
39
Early backer (in before they grew)
270/274
Grantees still filing
170/274
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KATO KAGAKU CO LTD DBA HYATT REGENCY CHICAGO — $1,769,933 · OtherMARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES LLC — $1,576,564 · Other+156 more — $42,654,751 · Other+156 moreAuditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc — $500,000 · Arts & CultureAuditorium Thea…+34 more — $7,125,000 · Arts & Culture+34 moreNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC — $1,450,000 · Community ImprovementChicago Zoological Society — $250,000 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $250,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $250,000 · AnimalsTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $350,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $250,000 · EducationCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $250,000 · Environment
Other$46,001,248Arts & Culture$7,625,000Community Improvement$1,450,000Animals$750,000Education$600,000Environment$250,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC — $1,450,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetAuditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $350,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM — $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTRE — $250,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetChicago Architecture Foundation — $250,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChicago Zoological Society — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY — $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNAVY PIER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChicago West Community Music Center — $250,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART — $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC — $250,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET — $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $245,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER — $220,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO — $195,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC — $190,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Richard H Driehaus Museum — $190,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetChicago Children's Museum — $180,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc — $175,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetEVANSTON HISTORY CENTER — $155,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetDUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $155,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMONTICELLO RAILWAY MUSEUM INC — $140,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetVictory Gardens Theater — $140,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $140,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOOKINGGLASS THEATRE COMPANY — $140,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMUSIC INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $140,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC — $135,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CHICAGO PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY — $135,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC
  • Who funds Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Prince FoundationIL69× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Prince Foundation · League of Chicago Theatres Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · The Richard H Driehaus Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · Elizabeth F Cheney Foundation · John R Halligan Charitable Fund · Illinois Humanities Council Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Walder Foundation · Bayless Family Foundation · Alphawood Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph