Skip to content
The Hilde Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Hilde Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$90kReligion$88kHealth$77kInternational$30kArts & Culture$15kYouth Development$14kEnvironment$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,947
Median grant
6
States reached
$766k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCCALLUM THEATER FOUNDATION$15,000
LOMA LINDA ACADEMY$6,656
BREAKTHROUGH T1D RIDE$6,460
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$6,340
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,947
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
COMMUNITY CANCER FUND$750
WORLD VISION$420
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$106
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RISE ABOVE: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $1k → 14%COMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $13k → 12%CAMP KESEM: $2k → 14%COMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $9k → 12%COMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $750 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
WY
CA
UT
CO
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 12 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$217k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentInternationalReligionHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH
    3× · 2017–2019 · $44k · revenue +24%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +125%
  • American Forests
    2× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +588%

Funded once

  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • GC
    GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
2
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Cascade Climate Inc

To accelerate progress in interventions that harness Earths natural systems to stabilize the climate.

Environment
6
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
7
Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation

The tahoe truckee community foundation brings together trusted partners to align strategies and inspire philanthropy to nurture a resilient community and environment.

Philanthropy
8
Land Trust of the Treasure Valley

To create oppurtunites for conservation of natural, scenic, historic, recreational and agricultural values of southwestern idaho's open spaces through collabarative efforts for current and future generations. the land trust indentifies…

Environment
9
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Teton Valley Mental Health Coalition Inc

Our mission is to promote mental wellness in teton valley by providing outreach, education, and connection to services.

Health
12
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lane College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $49,329 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYMARINERS CHURCH: $23,300 · OtherMARINERS CHURCHTETON VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,200 · OtherTETON VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCHBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,663 · OtherBOISE STATE UNIVERSITYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSHADY CANYON GOLF CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+19 more: $55,022 · Other+19 moreVISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT: $22,575 · InternationalVISIONS GLOBAL…GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $20,000 · InternationalGENESIS COMMUN…WORLD VISION INC: $2,765 · InternationalWORLD VISION I…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $43,500 · ReligionGLOBAL MEDIA …+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $22,650 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRISE ABOV…Camp Kesem National: $1,500 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $1,100 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMcCallum Theatre Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE TETON RIVER INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Forests: $3,000 · EnvironmentHENRYS LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $1,110 · EnvironmentVALLEY ADVOCATES FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · Health+1 more: $106 · Health
Other$211,014International$46,340Religion$44,500Human Services$31,250Arts & Culture$15,000Environment$10,110Health$6,106

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $43,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $22,650 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetVISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT: $22,575 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMcCallum Theatre Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSHADY CANYON GOLF CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TETON RIVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Forests: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,765 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY NETWORK INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLANE COLLEGE: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRYS LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $1,110 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeton Valley Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY ADVOCATES FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The US Charitable Gif…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hilde Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hilde Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Rise Above Foundation Inc: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hilde Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home