· Private foundation
Andrew Sabin Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k110 grants · $278k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $671k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $593k
- $250k+6 grants · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $2,050,000 |
| WAKE FOREST FUND | $1,015,500 |
| TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $1,000,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $505,000 |
| BERKSHIRE SCHOOL | $405,070 |
| SOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY | $275,650 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $80,550 |
| COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION | $80,250 |
| CONSERVAMERICA | $80,000 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC | $75,000 |
| SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $66,000 |
| ELLIS ISLAND HONORS SOCIETY | $60,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $51,500 |
| JEWISH CENTER OF THE HAMPTONS | $30,380 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
203 repeat relationships — 130 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +12% · 39% of their budget
- PCPANTHERA CORPORATION4× · 2020–2023 · $481k · revenue +64%
- WCWildlife Conservation Society5× · 2020–2024 · $417k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $402k
- RCROTARY CLUB KOSICEone grant, 2022 · $121k
- MHMONTAUK HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.
The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Community Trust and the most unlike its peers is American Airpower Museum Co Cockpit Cpt Usa Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
157 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 157 of the 517 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PANTHERA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ROAD SAFETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELLIS ISLAND HONORS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MONTAUK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Worldwide Friends Foundation ↗
- Who funds TURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAMS TENT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Kate Cassidy Foundation · Kazickas Family Foundation · Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht Foundation · The Reba Judith Sandler Foundation Inc · The Donald and Barbara Zucker Family Foundation · The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc · Pilzer Foundation Inc · Indian Trail Charitable Foundation Inc · Hamptons Invitational Charitable Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andrew Sabin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.