· Private foundation
The Hernan & Orfi Barros Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k64 grants · $118k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $288k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO | $250,000 |
| GLENDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| GLENDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| VALLEJO DRIVE CHURCH | $88,000 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVE | $25,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH HOLLYWOOD | $25,000 |
| LA SIERRA UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| GLENDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| VALLEJO DRIVE CHURCH | $25,000 |
| PHILOSCARE CORP | $20,000 |
| JUST HORIZONS ALLIANCE INC | $20,000 |
| ADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIO | $10,000 |
| WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO | $10,000 |
| GLENDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| GLENDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $353k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GAGlendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale6× · 2019–2025 · $589k · revenue +25%
- PCPHILOSCARE CORP5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +144%
- LLLoma Linda University Medical Auxiliary4× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- GMGOSPEL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -11%
- PSPASADENA SPANISH SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $10k
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc and the most unlike its peers is Zoeys Light Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Glendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale ↗
- Who funds White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn ↗
- Who funds La Sierra University ↗
- Who funds PHILOSCARE CORP ↗
- Who funds Loma Linda University Medical Auxiliary ↗
- Who funds ADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds JUST HORIZONS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds GLENDALE COMMUNITY FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KHEHSED INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds L A WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MARIPOSA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The James J and Sue Femino Foundation · Versacare Inc · Winifred Stevens Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · QueensCare · Lon V Smith Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Pasadena Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hernan & Orfi Barros Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Adventist Development & Relief Agency International — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.