Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Heritage Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$429kEducation$423kHealth$204kArts & Culture$75kHuman Services$67kYouth Development$66kInternational$41kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WILBERFORCE SCHOOL$50,000
DAUGHTERS AGAINST ALZHEIMERS$15,000
K-LIFE$15,000
THE NAVIGATORS$15,000
HARVEST USA$10,000
ATLANTA YOUTH PROJECT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUDY$10,000
AFRICAN INLAND MISSION$7,500
X CARES$5,000
MUST MINISTRIES$5,000
CITY OF REFUGE$5,000
HOUSE OF CHERITH$5,000
CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $8k → 8%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 8%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 8%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 8%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 8%VOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY: $1k → 16%HOUSE OF CHERITH: $5k → 13%HOUSE OF CHERITH: $5k → 13%HOUSE OF CHERITH: $5k → 13%HOUSE OF CHERITH: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CO
NE
VA
NC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 27 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$1.3M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+224%

Still filing today

56%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WILBERFORCE SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +101%
  • HU
    HARVEST USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +6%
  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $85k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • NC
    NAVIGATORS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TA
    TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH ATL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

4
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

7
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

8
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

9
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
10
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

11
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

12
Florida United Methodist Children's Home Inc

Empowering children and families to experience the transforming love of christ through evidence-based care and holistic services

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Christian Campus Fellowship and the most unlike its peers is X Cares. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%64%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

K-LIFE — $140,000 · OtherK-LIFETHE NAVIGATORS — $75,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSATLANTA YOUTH PROJECT — $55,500 · OtherATLANTA YOUTH PROJECTIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVISTE - VOLS IN SERVICE TO ELDERLY — $32,500 · OtherVISTE - VOLS IN SERVICE TO ELDERLYIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherTHE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Other+15 more — $128,900 · Other+15 moreTHE WILBERFORCE SCHOOL INC — $380,000 · EducationTHE WILBERFORCE SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC — $85,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INCAMERICA COUNCIL OF ASIAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF INDIA INC — $37,500 · EducationAMERICA COUNCIL OF ASIAN CHRISTIAN ACADE…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationHARVEST USA — $102,500 · HealthHARVEST USADaughters Against Alzheimer's Inc — $55,000 · HealthDaughters Ag…+2 more — $4,000 · HealthCITY OF REFUGE — $50,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $41,000 · ReligionCOATES MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 · ReligionMust Ministries Inc — $40,000 · Human ServicesCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME — $23,500 · Human ServicesHouse of Cherith Inc — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $42,500 · PhilanthropyX CARES — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$511,900Education$507,500Health$161,500Religion$106,000Human Services$84,500Philanthropy$42,500Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WILBERFORCE SCHOOL INC — $380,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHARVEST USA — $102,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC — $85,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetDaughters Against Alzheimer's Inc — $55,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE — $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $42,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMust Ministries Inc — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA COUNCIL OF ASIAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF INDIA INC — $37,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME — $23,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHouse of Cherith Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOATES MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGEORGIA TECH CHRISTIAN CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP — $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLAKELAND VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WILBERFORCE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds HARVEST USA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Daughters Against Alzheimer's Inc
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Must Ministries Inc
  • Who funds AMERICA COUNCIL OF ASIAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF INDIA INC
  • Who funds CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME
  • Who funds House of Cherith Inc
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COATES MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH CHRISTIAN CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds X CARES
  • Who funds LAKELAND VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE TO THE ELDERLY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Heritage Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph